A collaborative workflow for building ontologies: A case study in the biomedical field

Ricardo Gacitúa, P. Sawyer, Mercedes Argüello Casteleiro, J. Des, Rogelio Perez, Maria Jesus Fernandez Prieto, H. Paniagua
{"title":"A collaborative workflow for building ontologies: A case study in the biomedical field","authors":"Ricardo Gacitúa, P. Sawyer, Mercedes Argüello Casteleiro, J. Des, Rogelio Perez, Maria Jesus Fernandez Prieto, H. Paniagua","doi":"10.1109/RCIS.2009.5089275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much medical knowledge is contained within available literature, such as clinical guidelines and protocols. Recently, an interest has been developed in automatic content extraction to construct ontologies of this knowledge to make it more widely available. With groups of domain experts distributed geographically, and the growing amount of medical literature, an important challenge is to develop collaborative workflows to support ways for domain experts to contribute in the ontology learning process. This paper presents a collaborative workflow for ontology learning based on coupling an Ontology Learning Tool (OntoLancs) with and Ontology engineer (Protégé) to provide semi-automatic support for text mining and a collaborative tool to model formal ontologies. The work presented in this paper was evaluated with a case study on a Clinical Practice Guideline of Diabetic Retinopathy. The major benefits of coupling OntoLancs with Protégé are: a) a higher level of automation in the creation of domain ontologies and models, and b) strengthened communication and information exchange among domain experts that are physically distributed. Validations of user experiences indicate the applicability of our approach.","PeriodicalId":180106,"journal":{"name":"2009 Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2009.5089275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Much medical knowledge is contained within available literature, such as clinical guidelines and protocols. Recently, an interest has been developed in automatic content extraction to construct ontologies of this knowledge to make it more widely available. With groups of domain experts distributed geographically, and the growing amount of medical literature, an important challenge is to develop collaborative workflows to support ways for domain experts to contribute in the ontology learning process. This paper presents a collaborative workflow for ontology learning based on coupling an Ontology Learning Tool (OntoLancs) with and Ontology engineer (Protégé) to provide semi-automatic support for text mining and a collaborative tool to model formal ontologies. The work presented in this paper was evaluated with a case study on a Clinical Practice Guideline of Diabetic Retinopathy. The major benefits of coupling OntoLancs with Protégé are: a) a higher level of automation in the creation of domain ontologies and models, and b) strengthened communication and information exchange among domain experts that are physically distributed. Validations of user experiences indicate the applicability of our approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建本体的协作工作流:生物医学领域的案例研究
许多医学知识都包含在现有的文献中,如临床指南和协议。最近,人们对自动内容提取产生了兴趣,以构建这些知识的本体,使其更广泛地可用。随着领域专家群体的地理分布和医学文献的不断增加,一个重要的挑战是开发协作工作流程,以支持领域专家在本体学习过程中做出贡献。本文提出了一种基于本体学习工具(OntoLancs)与本体工程师(prot )耦合的本体学习协作工作流程,为文本挖掘提供半自动支持,并为形式化本体建模提供协作工具。本文以糖尿病视网膜病变临床实践指南为例进行了评价。将OntoLancs与prot结合起来的主要好处是:a)在创建领域本体和模型方面实现了更高的自动化水平,b)加强了物理分布的领域专家之间的沟通和信息交换。用户体验的验证表明了我们方法的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Goal reasoning for quality elicitation in the ISOA approach AgentMat: Framework for data scraping and semantization Benchmark graphs for the evaluation of clustering algorithms Modelling semantic workflows for E-Government applications Matrix model of trust management in P2P networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1