Commento a Montanaro E Tonveronachi (A Comment to Montanaro E Tonveronachi)

M. Onado
{"title":"Commento a Montanaro E Tonveronachi (A Comment to Montanaro E Tonveronachi)","authors":"M. Onado","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3218943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Italian Abstract:</b> Le banche europee, e quelle italiane non fanno eccezione, sono cresciute molto grazie all’avvento dell’euro, secondo molti sono cresciute troppo. Hanno inoltre accumulato problemi strutturali che spiegano i risultati poco incoraggianti dei test svolti da Montanaro e Tonveronachi (2017). Questi problemi non possono essere risolti solo dalla ripresa ciclica, ma richiedono soluzioni più ampie e incisive di quelle, pur importanti, finora attuate a livello europeo. A differenza di altri paesi, l’Europa non ha proposto indagini né rapporti ufficiali sulle cause profonde della crisi e sul tipo di sistema bancario che vogliamo.European, and among them Italian banks, have grown too large since the inception of the euro. <br> <b>English Abstract:</b> European, and among them Italian banks, have grown too large since the inception of the euro. They have accumulated structural problems underlying the results of the stress tests proposed by Montanaro and Tonveronachi (2017). These problems cannot be automatically solved by the cyclic upturn and require wider and more ambitious solutions at the European level. Differently from other countries, the EU has not produced reports or formal investigations on the deep causes of the financial crisis, and notably has not discussed what sort of banking system it wants.","PeriodicalId":296326,"journal":{"name":"International Institutions: European Union eJournal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Institutions: European Union eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3218943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Italian Abstract: Le banche europee, e quelle italiane non fanno eccezione, sono cresciute molto grazie all’avvento dell’euro, secondo molti sono cresciute troppo. Hanno inoltre accumulato problemi strutturali che spiegano i risultati poco incoraggianti dei test svolti da Montanaro e Tonveronachi (2017). Questi problemi non possono essere risolti solo dalla ripresa ciclica, ma richiedono soluzioni più ampie e incisive di quelle, pur importanti, finora attuate a livello europeo. A differenza di altri paesi, l’Europa non ha proposto indagini né rapporti ufficiali sulle cause profonde della crisi e sul tipo di sistema bancario che vogliamo.European, and among them Italian banks, have grown too large since the inception of the euro.
English Abstract: European, and among them Italian banks, have grown too large since the inception of the euro. They have accumulated structural problems underlying the results of the stress tests proposed by Montanaro and Tonveronachi (2017). These problems cannot be automatically solved by the cyclic upturn and require wider and more ambitious solutions at the European level. Differently from other countries, the EU has not produced reports or formal investigations on the deep causes of the financial crisis, and notably has not discussed what sort of banking system it wants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒙塔纳罗·E·托维罗纳奇评论(对蒙塔纳罗·E·托维罗纳奇的评论)
意大利摘要:由于欧元的出现,欧洲银行(意大利银行也不例外)增长了很多,许多人认为它们增长得太多了。他们还积累了结构性问题,这就解释了为什么蒙塔纳罗和通韦罗纳奇(2017)的测试结果不令人鼓舞。这些问题不仅可以通过周期性复苏来解决,还需要比迄今为止在欧洲层面上实施的那些重要的解决方案更广泛、更有效的解决方案。与其他国家不同的是,欧洲没有就危机的根本原因以及我们想要什么样的银行体系提出正式调查或报告。欧洲银行,以及许多意大利银行,自从欧元陷入困境以来,已经变得太大了。英语摘要:欧洲和他们的许多意大利银行,自从欧元陷入困境以来,已经变得太大了。他们积累了结构性问题,破坏了山民和通韦罗纳奇(2017)提出的压力测试的结果。这些问题不能自动通过cyc升级、查询wider和更多雄心勃勃的欧洲解决方案来解决。与其他国家不同的是,欧盟没有就金融危机的深层原因提出报告或形式调查,也没有讨论它想要什么样的银行体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mind the (trade) gap! How costly is erecting barriers to trade? LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y LA SEGURIDAD ALIMENTARIA AD EXTRA (The European Union and Ad Extra Food Security) How Global Jihad Relocalises and Where it Leads. The Case of HTS, the Former AQ Franchise in Syria Responding to Hybridity in an Unstable Neighborhood: The Efficiency of the EU State-centric Approach to the Crisis in Libya and Ukraine Report on the Dynamics of Differentiated Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1