The Make-or-Buy Decision: Lessons from Empirical Studies

Peter G. Klein
{"title":"The Make-or-Buy Decision: Lessons from Empirical Studies","authors":"Peter G. Klein","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.529962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Should a firm make its own inputs, buy them on the spot market, or maintain an ongo- ing relationship with a particular supplier? The emergence of the transaction cost approach to vertical integration in the 1970s and 1980s generated a substantial body of empirical research on vertical firm boundaries and related issues in contracting and organizational design. This chapter reviews the empirical literature on the make-or-buy decision, focusing on the transaction cost approach. After reviewing the Coasian or \"contractual\" approach to vertical integration I summa- rize the most common empirical strategies, highlighting current controversies over data and methods, sample selection, and related issues. I next provide a sampler of evidence on compo- nent procurement, forward integration into marketing and distribution, contractual design, and the use of informal agreements. Finally, I discuss outstanding challenges and directions for fu- ture research, focusing on the measurement and definition of key variables, the role of asset specificity, the comparison of rival explanations, causality, and the effects of the legal and regu- latory environment.","PeriodicalId":101736,"journal":{"name":"CORI: Contracting & Organizations Research Institute","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"227","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CORI: Contracting & Organizations Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.529962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 227

Abstract

Should a firm make its own inputs, buy them on the spot market, or maintain an ongo- ing relationship with a particular supplier? The emergence of the transaction cost approach to vertical integration in the 1970s and 1980s generated a substantial body of empirical research on vertical firm boundaries and related issues in contracting and organizational design. This chapter reviews the empirical literature on the make-or-buy decision, focusing on the transaction cost approach. After reviewing the Coasian or "contractual" approach to vertical integration I summa- rize the most common empirical strategies, highlighting current controversies over data and methods, sample selection, and related issues. I next provide a sampler of evidence on compo- nent procurement, forward integration into marketing and distribution, contractual design, and the use of informal agreements. Finally, I discuss outstanding challenges and directions for fu- ture research, focusing on the measurement and definition of key variables, the role of asset specificity, the comparison of rival explanations, causality, and the effects of the legal and regu- latory environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自制或购买决策:来自实证研究的经验教训
公司应该自己生产投入物,还是在现货市场上购买,还是与特定的供应商保持持续的关系?20世纪70年代和80年代出现的垂直整合交易成本方法产生了大量关于垂直企业边界以及合同和组织设计相关问题的实证研究。本章回顾了关于“做还是买”决策的实证文献,重点关注交易成本方法。在回顾了科斯式或“契约式”垂直整合方法之后,我总结了最常见的实证策略,强调了当前在数据和方法、样本选择和相关问题上的争议。接下来,我将提供关于零部件采购、市场营销和分销的前瞻性整合、合同设计以及非正式协议使用的证据样本。最后,我讨论了未来研究的突出挑战和方向,重点是关键变量的测量和定义,资产专用性的作用,竞争解释的比较,因果关系以及法律和监管环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Theory of the Firm and its Critics: A Stocktaking and Assessment Entrepreneurship and the Economic Theory of the Firm: Any Gains from Trade? The Make-or-Buy Decision: Lessons from Empirical Studies Organizational Economics in Agricultural Policy Analysis Organizational Economics in the Food, Agribusiness, and Agricultural Sectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1