Time, computational complexity, and probability in the analysis of distance-bounding protocols

J. Comput. Secur. Pub Date : 2017-02-12 DOI:10.3233/JCS-0560
M. Kanovich, Tajana Ban Kirigin, Vivek Nigam, A. Scedrov, C. Talcott
{"title":"Time, computational complexity, and probability in the analysis of distance-bounding protocols","authors":"M. Kanovich, Tajana Ban Kirigin, Vivek Nigam, A. Scedrov, C. Talcott","doi":"10.3233/JCS-0560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many security protocols rely on the assumptions on the physical properties in which its protocol sessions will be carried out. For instance, Distance Bounding Protocols take into account the round trip time of messages and the transmission velocity to infer an upper bound of the distance between two agents. We classify such security protocols as Cyber-Physical. Time plays a key role in design and analysis of many of these protocols. This paper investigates the foundational differences and the impacts on the analysis when using models with discrete time and models with dense time. We show that there are attacks that can be found by models using dense time, but not when using discrete time. We illustrate this with a novel attack that can be carried out on most Distance Bounding Protocols. In this attack, one exploits the execution delay of instructions during one clock cycle to convince a verifier that he is in a location different from his actual position. We additionally present a probabilistic analysis of this novel attack. As a formal model for representing and analyzing Cyber-Physical properties, we propose a Multiset Rewriting model with dense time suitable for specifying cyber-physical security protocols. We introduce Circle-Configurations and show that they can be used to symbolically solve the reachability problem for our model, and show that for the important class of balanced theories the reachability problem is PSPACE-complete. We also show how our model can be implemented using the computational rewriting tool Maude, the machinery that automatically searches for such attacks.","PeriodicalId":142580,"journal":{"name":"J. Comput. Secur.","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Comput. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JCS-0560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Many security protocols rely on the assumptions on the physical properties in which its protocol sessions will be carried out. For instance, Distance Bounding Protocols take into account the round trip time of messages and the transmission velocity to infer an upper bound of the distance between two agents. We classify such security protocols as Cyber-Physical. Time plays a key role in design and analysis of many of these protocols. This paper investigates the foundational differences and the impacts on the analysis when using models with discrete time and models with dense time. We show that there are attacks that can be found by models using dense time, but not when using discrete time. We illustrate this with a novel attack that can be carried out on most Distance Bounding Protocols. In this attack, one exploits the execution delay of instructions during one clock cycle to convince a verifier that he is in a location different from his actual position. We additionally present a probabilistic analysis of this novel attack. As a formal model for representing and analyzing Cyber-Physical properties, we propose a Multiset Rewriting model with dense time suitable for specifying cyber-physical security protocols. We introduce Circle-Configurations and show that they can be used to symbolically solve the reachability problem for our model, and show that for the important class of balanced theories the reachability problem is PSPACE-complete. We also show how our model can be implemented using the computational rewriting tool Maude, the machinery that automatically searches for such attacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析距离边界协议的时间、计算复杂度和概率
许多安全协议依赖于对其协议会话将在其中执行的物理属性的假设。例如,距离边界协议考虑消息的往返时间和传输速度来推断两个代理之间距离的上界。我们把这种安全协议归类为网络物理协议。时间在许多协议的设计和分析中起着关键作用。本文探讨了离散时间模型与密集时间模型的基本区别及其对分析的影响。我们表明,使用密集时间的模型可以发现攻击,但使用离散时间的模型却不能发现攻击。我们用一种新的攻击来说明这一点,这种攻击可以在大多数距离边界协议上进行。在这种攻击中,一个人利用一个时钟周期内指令的执行延迟来说服验证者他所处的位置与他的实际位置不同。我们还提出了这种新型攻击的概率分析。作为一种表示和分析网络物理特性的形式化模型,我们提出了一种适合指定网络物理安全协议的密集时间多集重写模型。我们引入了圆构型,并证明了它们可以用来象征性地解决模型的可达性问题,并证明了对于一类重要的平衡理论,可达性问题是pspace完全的。我们还展示了如何使用计算重写工具Maude实现我们的模型,Maude是自动搜索此类攻击的机器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data privacy in the Internet of Things based on anonymization: A review A mutation-based approach for the formal and automated analysis of security ceremonies StegEdge: Privacy protection of unknown sensitive attributes in edge intelligence via deception IsaNet: A framework for verifying secure data plane protocols A review on cloud security issues and solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1