Foliar Application of Salicylic Acid and Zinc Sulphate Levels on Growth and Yield of Squash under Net House Condition

Sayma Kabir, T. Mostarin, K. Khatun, Samsun Nahar Hashi, Shapla Akter, Khodaiza Banu, Nasir Mahmud, Amir Abdullah Hasnine, Sanchita Roy, M. Samad
{"title":"Foliar Application of Salicylic Acid and Zinc Sulphate Levels on Growth and Yield of Squash under Net House Condition","authors":"Sayma Kabir, T. Mostarin, K. Khatun, Samsun Nahar Hashi, Shapla Akter, Khodaiza Banu, Nasir Mahmud, Amir Abdullah Hasnine, Sanchita Roy, M. Samad","doi":"10.9734/ajrcs/2023/v8i4190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was conducted at Horticulture Farm of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka during November, 2020 to February, 2021. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The experiment had two factors (Different levels of salicylic acid, S0= No salicylic acid (control), S1= 60 ppm of salicylic acid, S2= 90 ppm of salicylic acid and different levels of zinc, Z0= No zinc sulphate (control), Z1= 25 ppm of zinc sulphate, Z2= 50 ppm of zinc sulphate. Different levels of salicylic, zinc sulphate and also their combinations showed significant influence on different growth, yield contributing parameters and yield of squash. The treatment, S2 showed highest results in fruit yield per plant (2422.7 g), fruit yield per plot (9.68 kg) and fruit yield per ha (37.83 t) compared to control. In case of zinc treatments, the highest results in fruit yield per plant (2597.1 g), highest fruit yield per plot (10.38 kg) and highest fruit yield per ha (31.74 t) were found from Z1 compared to control. Likewise, the treatment combination of S2Z1 (90 ppm of salicylic acid and 25 ppm of zinc sulphate) gave the highest fruit yield per plant (3045.4 g) fruit yield per plot (12.18 kg) and highest yield per ha (47.57 t) where the lowest results were found from the treatment combination of S0Z0 (control). The highest gross return (BDT 1189425), net return (BDT 881669) and BCR (3.86) were obtained from the treatment combination of S2Z1 where the lowest was obtained from S0Z0. It can be concluded that from economic point of view, S2Z1 (90 ppm of salicylic acid and 25 ppm of zinc sulphate) treatment combination is suitable for squash cultivation than other treatment combinations.","PeriodicalId":415976,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcs/2023/v8i4190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Horticulture Farm of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka during November, 2020 to February, 2021. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The experiment had two factors (Different levels of salicylic acid, S0= No salicylic acid (control), S1= 60 ppm of salicylic acid, S2= 90 ppm of salicylic acid and different levels of zinc, Z0= No zinc sulphate (control), Z1= 25 ppm of zinc sulphate, Z2= 50 ppm of zinc sulphate. Different levels of salicylic, zinc sulphate and also their combinations showed significant influence on different growth, yield contributing parameters and yield of squash. The treatment, S2 showed highest results in fruit yield per plant (2422.7 g), fruit yield per plot (9.68 kg) and fruit yield per ha (37.83 t) compared to control. In case of zinc treatments, the highest results in fruit yield per plant (2597.1 g), highest fruit yield per plot (10.38 kg) and highest fruit yield per ha (31.74 t) were found from Z1 compared to control. Likewise, the treatment combination of S2Z1 (90 ppm of salicylic acid and 25 ppm of zinc sulphate) gave the highest fruit yield per plant (3045.4 g) fruit yield per plot (12.18 kg) and highest yield per ha (47.57 t) where the lowest results were found from the treatment combination of S0Z0 (control). The highest gross return (BDT 1189425), net return (BDT 881669) and BCR (3.86) were obtained from the treatment combination of S2Z1 where the lowest was obtained from S0Z0. It can be concluded that from economic point of view, S2Z1 (90 ppm of salicylic acid and 25 ppm of zinc sulphate) treatment combination is suitable for squash cultivation than other treatment combinations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水杨酸和硫酸锌对网房条件下南瓜生长和产量的影响
田间试验于2020年11月至2021年2月在达卡Sher-e-Bangla农业大学园艺农场进行。实验采用随机完全区组设计,重复3次。实验设两个因素(水杨酸不同浓度,S0=无水杨酸(对照),S1= 60 ppm水杨酸,S2= 90 ppm水杨酸和不同浓度的锌,Z0=无硫酸锌(对照),Z1= 25 ppm硫酸锌,Z2= 50 ppm硫酸锌)。不同水平的水杨酸、硫酸锌及其组合对南瓜的生长、产量贡献参数和产量均有显著影响。与对照相比,S2处理单株产量最高(2422.7 g),亩产最高(9.68 kg),亩产最高(37.83 t)。与对照相比,锌处理Z1单株产量最高(2597.1 g),亩产最高(10.38 kg),亩产最高(31.74 t)。同样,S2Z1(水杨酸90ppm和硫酸锌25ppm)处理组合的单株产量最高(3045.4克),每地块产量最高(12.18公斤),每公顷产量最高(47.57吨),而S0Z0(对照)处理组合的产量最低。S2Z1组合的总收益(BDT 1189425)、净收益(BDT 881669)和BCR(3.86)最高,S0Z0最低。从经济角度看,S2Z1(水杨酸90ppm +硫酸锌25ppm)处理组合较其他处理组合更适合南瓜栽培。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allelopathic Impact of Callistemon Citrinus on Sorghum Bicolor Growth under Salinity Stress Phytotoxicity and Residual Effect of Some Herbicides on three Egyptian Rice Cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) BRRI Dhan107: High Protein Premium Quality Rice Variety for Irrigated Ecosystem in Bangladesh Yield Maximization of Rice (Oryza sativa) through Integrated Nutrient Management Comparative Performance of Different Fertilizer Recommendation Methods on Growth and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa) in Old Brahmaputra Floodplain Soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1