A Comparative Study on the Sub-Model Method and the Local Model Method in the Tightness Analysis of Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints of Heat Exchanger

Xiangbing Zhang, Chenghong Duan, Xiangpeng Luo, Jinhao Huang
{"title":"A Comparative Study on the Sub-Model Method and the Local Model Method in the Tightness Analysis of Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints of Heat Exchanger","authors":"Xiangbing Zhang, Chenghong Duan, Xiangpeng Luo, Jinhao Huang","doi":"10.1115/pvp2020-21048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the finite element analysis of large-scale heat exchangers, the tightness analysis of tube-to-tubesheet joints of heat exchanger is classified into a highly nonlinear problem due to the existence of contact between tube and tubesheet, and there are a large number of tubes in the heat exchanger. These all make it difficult to analyze the tube-to-tubesheet joints in detail with the full model method. The traditional local model method simplifies the problem in a certain extent, but its boundary condition is different from the actual situation, which will result in an inaccurate result. In this paper, the sub model method is introduced into the tightness analysis of tube-to-tubesheet joints of the heat exchanger. Taking a U-tube heat exchanger as an example, the traditional local model method and the sub model method are used to analyze the tightness of tube-to-tubesheet joints respectively. The residual contact pressure of the seal ring on the contact surface of tube-to-tubesheet joints is taken as the criterion to evaluate the tightness of the joint. Variations of the residual contact pressure obtained by the two methods are comparatively studied. It is found that the traditional local model method is not conservative enough compared with the sub model method, and the sub model method can simulate more real boundary condition and obtain tightness conditions of the joint in different locations,which is a more effective analysis method. In addition, it is found that the choice of cutting boundary of the sub model has certain influence on the analysis results.","PeriodicalId":150804,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2020-21048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the finite element analysis of large-scale heat exchangers, the tightness analysis of tube-to-tubesheet joints of heat exchanger is classified into a highly nonlinear problem due to the existence of contact between tube and tubesheet, and there are a large number of tubes in the heat exchanger. These all make it difficult to analyze the tube-to-tubesheet joints in detail with the full model method. The traditional local model method simplifies the problem in a certain extent, but its boundary condition is different from the actual situation, which will result in an inaccurate result. In this paper, the sub model method is introduced into the tightness analysis of tube-to-tubesheet joints of the heat exchanger. Taking a U-tube heat exchanger as an example, the traditional local model method and the sub model method are used to analyze the tightness of tube-to-tubesheet joints respectively. The residual contact pressure of the seal ring on the contact surface of tube-to-tubesheet joints is taken as the criterion to evaluate the tightness of the joint. Variations of the residual contact pressure obtained by the two methods are comparatively studied. It is found that the traditional local model method is not conservative enough compared with the sub model method, and the sub model method can simulate more real boundary condition and obtain tightness conditions of the joint in different locations,which is a more effective analysis method. In addition, it is found that the choice of cutting boundary of the sub model has certain influence on the analysis results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
换热器管板接头紧密性分析中的子模型法与局部模型法的比较研究
在大型换热器的有限元分析中,由于管与管板之间存在接触,且换热器中存在大量的管,因此换热器管与管板连接处的紧密性分析属于高度非线性问题。这些都给采用全模型方法对管板连接进行详细分析带来了困难。传统的局部模型方法在一定程度上简化了问题,但其边界条件与实际情况不同,会导致计算结果不准确。本文将子模型法引入到换热器管板连接的紧密性分析中。以u型管换热器为例,分别采用传统的局部模型法和子模型法对管板连接的紧密性进行了分析。将密封圈在管板连接接触面上的残余接触压力作为评价管板连接紧密性的标准。比较研究了两种方法得到的残余接触压力的变化规律。研究发现,传统的局部模型方法与子模型方法相比不够保守,子模型方法可以模拟更真实的边界条件,获得不同位置节点的紧密性条件,是一种更有效的分析方法。此外,还发现子模型切割边界的选择对分析结果有一定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Study of Packed Catalyst Bed Stresses for Outward Radial Flow Reactors Alternative Design Approach by Finite Element Analysis for High Pressure Equipment A Review of Temperature Reduction Methods in Codes and Standards for Pipe Supports Elephant Foot Buckling Analysis of Large Unanchored Oil Storage Tanks With Tapered Shells Subjected to Foundation Settlement Development of Stress Intensification Factors for Collared Type Piping Joints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1