Increasingly Heterogeneous Ages at First Birth by Education in 'Conservative' Southern-European and 'Liberal' Anglo-American Family-Policy Regimes

M. Rendall, E. Aracil, Christos Bagavos, C. Couet, A. DeRose, P. DiGiulio, T. Lappegård, I. Robert-Bobée, M. Rønsen, Steve Smallwood, G. Verropoulou
{"title":"Increasingly Heterogeneous Ages at First Birth by Education in 'Conservative' Southern-European and 'Liberal' Anglo-American Family-Policy Regimes","authors":"M. Rendall, E. Aracil, Christos Bagavos, C. Couet, A. DeRose, P. DiGiulio, T. Lappegård, I. Robert-Bobée, M. Rønsen, Steve Smallwood, G. Verropoulou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1369358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The claim that family-policy regime may influence socio-economic differentials in fertility has to date been explored mainly with respect to 'liberal' Anglo-American regimes. The authors broaden the contrast with 'family-friendly' regimes here to include in the 'family-unfriendly' group 'conservative' Southern European regimes. Comparing education differentials in age at first birth, they find educationally-heterogeneous shifts between 1950s and 1960s birth cohorts of women in Greece, Italy, and Spain. The patterns of these shifts are similar to those seen for British and American birth cohorts, and contrast with educationally-homogeneous shifts across birth cohorts in Norway and France. They argue that these findings support the hypothesis that the role of family-policy regime in mediating growth in socio-economic differentials in fertility has increased as combining employment and family has become more normative among women throughout industrialized countries.","PeriodicalId":340671,"journal":{"name":"RAND Corporation Law","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAND Corporation Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1369358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The claim that family-policy regime may influence socio-economic differentials in fertility has to date been explored mainly with respect to 'liberal' Anglo-American regimes. The authors broaden the contrast with 'family-friendly' regimes here to include in the 'family-unfriendly' group 'conservative' Southern European regimes. Comparing education differentials in age at first birth, they find educationally-heterogeneous shifts between 1950s and 1960s birth cohorts of women in Greece, Italy, and Spain. The patterns of these shifts are similar to those seen for British and American birth cohorts, and contrast with educationally-homogeneous shifts across birth cohorts in Norway and France. They argue that these findings support the hypothesis that the role of family-policy regime in mediating growth in socio-economic differentials in fertility has increased as combining employment and family has become more normative among women throughout industrialized countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在“保守”的南欧和“自由”的英美家庭政策体制下,教育对初生年龄的影响越来越大
迄今为止,家庭政策制度可能影响生育率的社会经济差异的说法主要是在“自由”英美制度方面进行的。作者扩大了与“家庭友好”政权的对比,将“保守”的南欧政权纳入“家庭不友好”的群体。通过比较第一胎年龄的教育差异,他们发现,在希腊、意大利和西班牙,20世纪50年代至60年代的女性出生队列中,存在教育异质性的变化。这些变化的模式与英国和美国出生队列的变化相似,与挪威和法国出生队列的教育同质变化形成鲜明对比。他们认为,这些发现支持这样一种假设,即随着就业和家庭的结合在整个工业化国家的妇女中变得更加规范,家庭政策制度在调解生育率的社会经济差异增长方面的作用有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Labor Supply Consequences of the Opioid Crisis Who Gets Counted as Part of America’s STEM Workforce? The Implications of Different Classification Approaches for Understanding the Gender Gap in STEM Re-Evaluating the Returns to Language Skills Using Latent Trait Estimates Lessons Learned from Stabilization Initiatives in Afghanistan: A Systematic Review of Existing Research Characterization of Fertility Levels in Brazil, 1970-2010
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1