Performance Impact Analysis of Rounds and Amounts of Communication in Secure Multiparty Computation Based on Secret Sharing

Diana-Elena Falamas, K. Marton
{"title":"Performance Impact Analysis of Rounds and Amounts of Communication in Secure Multiparty Computation Based on Secret Sharing","authors":"Diana-Elena Falamas, K. Marton","doi":"10.1109/ROEDUNET.2019.8909467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data security is a key element in many IT systems. Secret values can be stored in databases after encrypting them (in particular by applying a secret sharing schema) but, in practice, these confidential values often need to be processed otherwise losing their usefulness. A possible solution is secure multiparty computation (known as MPC) that allows the computation of various functions directly on encrypted data, thus guaranteeing the confidentiality of the information during the whole process of querying databases. The main drawback for such systems is performance degradation, as secure computations on secret data imply multiple communication rounds and the exchange of messages with different lengths. In this paper, two sets of MPC subprotocols are benchmarked and compared considering the number of rounds and the communication cost, in order to assess which one of these parameters has a bigger impact on performance. Our results show that a small cost is more important in terms of efficiency than reducing the number of rounds.","PeriodicalId":309683,"journal":{"name":"2019 18th RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet)","volume":"2010 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 18th RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROEDUNET.2019.8909467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Data security is a key element in many IT systems. Secret values can be stored in databases after encrypting them (in particular by applying a secret sharing schema) but, in practice, these confidential values often need to be processed otherwise losing their usefulness. A possible solution is secure multiparty computation (known as MPC) that allows the computation of various functions directly on encrypted data, thus guaranteeing the confidentiality of the information during the whole process of querying databases. The main drawback for such systems is performance degradation, as secure computations on secret data imply multiple communication rounds and the exchange of messages with different lengths. In this paper, two sets of MPC subprotocols are benchmarked and compared considering the number of rounds and the communication cost, in order to assess which one of these parameters has a bigger impact on performance. Our results show that a small cost is more important in terms of efficiency than reducing the number of rounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于秘密共享的安全多方计算中通信轮数和通信量对性能的影响分析
数据安全是许多IT系统中的一个关键因素。秘密值可以在加密后存储在数据库中(特别是通过应用秘密共享模式),但是在实践中,通常需要处理这些机密值,否则将失去其用处。一种可能的解决方案是安全多方计算(称为MPC),它允许直接在加密数据上计算各种功能,从而在查询数据库的整个过程中保证信息的机密性。这种系统的主要缺点是性能下降,因为对秘密数据的安全计算意味着多次通信回合和不同长度的消息交换。本文对两组MPC子协议进行了基准测试和比较,考虑了轮数和通信成本,以评估哪一个参数对性能的影响更大。我们的研究结果表明,在效率方面,较小的成本比减少回合数更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adding Custom Sandbox Profiles to iOS Apps Double Standard Method for Designing Adaptive Backup Systems Performance analysis in private and public Cloud infrastructures Open-LTE Call Emulator in Software Defined Radio The Relational Parts of Speech in Text Analysis for Definition Detection, for Romanian Language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1