Are We Meeting Best Practice Standards?: A Longitudinal Analysis of Mental Health Practices Within the Florida Child Welfare System with Implications for Child Well-being

D. Dunleavy
{"title":"Are We Meeting Best Practice Standards?: A Longitudinal Analysis of Mental Health Practices Within the Florida Child Welfare System with Implications for Child Well-being","authors":"D. Dunleavy","doi":"10.36850/rga3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Best practice standards are one method by which medical providers ensure effective care, thus promoting\nwell-being. Though formal guidelines have been recently implemented to direct and standardize children’s\nmental healthcare in Florida, little research has evaluated the extent to which they are executed in practice.\nThis study aims to fill this gap by analyzing Florida Medicaid data. Individual-level data will be collected\nfrom a 12-month period from a random sample of children, on Medicaid, with a mental health diagnosis;\nto: 1) Describe the type and frequency of mental health services provided to this sample, including to\nthose in the child welfare system; 2) Evaluate the extent to which Florida’s Psychotherapeutic Medication\nTreatment Guidelines are adhered to; and 3) Analyze sociodemographic characteristics, to determine\nif there are predictive factors which account for undertreatment/overtreatment. Data will be coded for\ncongruence with these standards and analyzed using multinomial logistic regression","PeriodicalId":275817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trial and Error","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trial and Error","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36850/rga3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Best practice standards are one method by which medical providers ensure effective care, thus promoting well-being. Though formal guidelines have been recently implemented to direct and standardize children’s mental healthcare in Florida, little research has evaluated the extent to which they are executed in practice. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing Florida Medicaid data. Individual-level data will be collected from a 12-month period from a random sample of children, on Medicaid, with a mental health diagnosis; to: 1) Describe the type and frequency of mental health services provided to this sample, including to those in the child welfare system; 2) Evaluate the extent to which Florida’s Psychotherapeutic Medication Treatment Guidelines are adhered to; and 3) Analyze sociodemographic characteristics, to determine if there are predictive factors which account for undertreatment/overtreatment. Data will be coded for congruence with these standards and analyzed using multinomial logistic regression
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们是否符合最佳实践标准?佛罗里达儿童福利系统内心理健康实践的纵向分析及其对儿童福祉的影响
最佳实践标准是医疗提供者确保有效护理从而促进福祉的一种方法。虽然佛罗里达州最近实施了正式的指导方针来指导和规范儿童心理保健,但很少有研究评估这些指导方针在实践中的执行程度。本研究旨在通过分析佛罗里达州医疗补助数据来填补这一空白。个人层面的数据将从一个12个月的随机样本中收集,从医疗补助中获得精神健康诊断的儿童中:1)描述向该样本提供的精神健康服务的类型和频率,包括向儿童福利系统提供的服务;2)评估佛罗里达州精神治疗药物治疗指南的遵守程度;3)分析社会人口学特征,以确定是否存在导致治疗不足/过度治疗的预测因素。数据将被编码为符合这些标准,并使用多项逻辑回归进行分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serendipity in Scientific Research Three Persistent Myths about Open Science The Music Must Play On: The Music Therapy Sessions that Should not Have Stopped Medical Expert Endorsement Fails to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in U.K. Residents A Manifesto for Rewarding and Recognizing Team Infrastructure Roles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1