Medical Expert Endorsement Fails to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in U.K. Residents

Folco Panizza, P. Ronzani, Carlos Martini, Lucia Savadori, Matteo Motterlini
{"title":"Medical Expert Endorsement Fails to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in U.K. Residents","authors":"Folco Panizza, P. Ronzani, Carlos Martini, Lucia Savadori, Matteo Motterlini","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/gh5vy","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this report we outline the null findings of a pre-registered experiment on vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom. The experiment targeted vaccine misconceptions common among participants by presenting a correction to such claims endorsed by a group of medical experts. The experiment had the aim to increase vaccination intention and actual uptake during the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Our results revealed that, contrary to a similar study conducted with Italian residents, our intervention was unsuccessful in changing participants’ attitudes and behaviour towards COVID-19 vaccines. The report concludes with a discussion of the potential reasons for these null findings.","PeriodicalId":275817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trial and Error","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trial and Error","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gh5vy","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this report we outline the null findings of a pre-registered experiment on vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom. The experiment targeted vaccine misconceptions common among participants by presenting a correction to such claims endorsed by a group of medical experts. The experiment had the aim to increase vaccination intention and actual uptake during the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Our results revealed that, contrary to a similar study conducted with Italian residents, our intervention was unsuccessful in changing participants’ attitudes and behaviour towards COVID-19 vaccines. The report concludes with a discussion of the potential reasons for these null findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学专家的认可未能减少英国居民对疫苗的犹豫
在本报告中,我们概述了英国一项关于疫苗犹豫的预先注册实验的无效结果。该实验通过对一组医学专家认可的说法进行纠正,针对参与者中常见的疫苗误解。该实验旨在提高2021年COVID-19疫苗接种运动期间的疫苗接种意愿和实际接种率。我们的研究结果显示,与意大利居民进行的类似研究相反,我们的干预措施未能改变参与者对COVID-19疫苗的态度和行为。报告最后讨论了这些无效发现的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serendipity in Scientific Research Three Persistent Myths about Open Science The Music Must Play On: The Music Therapy Sessions that Should not Have Stopped Medical Expert Endorsement Fails to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in U.K. Residents A Manifesto for Rewarding and Recognizing Team Infrastructure Roles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1