Print or Electronic: Preferences of the New Generation of Medical and Dentistry Students

Sarah Amin Charania Amin Charania, Gati Ara, Asaad Khalid Khan, A. Sheikh, M. Devi, Aarish Lalani
{"title":"Print or Electronic: Preferences of the New Generation of Medical and Dentistry Students","authors":"Sarah Amin Charania Amin Charania, Gati Ara, Asaad Khalid Khan, A. Sheikh, M. Devi, Aarish Lalani","doi":"10.46663/ajsmu.v8i1.20-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To assess the preference for print or electronic media among undergraduate students of medical and dental colleges of Karachi and to compare the students of public versus private medical and dental colleges according to the study methods they prioritize Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted over a period of more than a year. At the confidence level of 95% and bound on error of 5%, a minimum sample size of 384 was calculated and sample size of 477 was finalized after allowing for a non-response rate of 24%. The convenience sampling technique was employed to select medical students. Data was collected using a structured, self- administered questionnaire in English language after a written Informed Consent was obtained from each participant. Data was analysed using SPSS version 20. The quantitative variables were represented as mean and standard deviation. The qualitative variables were represented as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square test of significance was applied for finding any significant differences. P-value of less than 0.05 was taken as significant. Result: The mean age of n=477 students was 21+/- 2 years. Majority were MBBS students, with 53% from public institutes. We found that 52% students preferred print medium, whereas 26% students preferred screens. There was an association between public sector colleges and preferring print medium (p= 0.0001). A significant association was found between gender and method of study (p=0.0001). Age was associated with preference for print medium (p=0.02), also higher level of study was associated with preferring print medium (p=0.001). Most students prioritized books (71%) but retained better with videos (63%). Most students (56%) preferred textbooks over reference books. Dr. Najeeb's videos were the most preferred videos (75%), furthermore, the most used site was Wikipedia (48%). Internet was the top source for preparing for PBLs (50%). Conclusion: The study showed that majority students still prefer print medium and prioritize books over other methods. Students claimed that they retain best with videos and books. So, increasing the use of videos for teaching is recommended. The Pandemic has necessitated the increased use of online teaching modalities. Students should be encouraged to use more reliable websites.","PeriodicalId":350655,"journal":{"name":"ANNALS of JINNAH SINDH MEDICAL UNIVERSITY","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANNALS of JINNAH SINDH MEDICAL UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46663/ajsmu.v8i1.20-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the preference for print or electronic media among undergraduate students of medical and dental colleges of Karachi and to compare the students of public versus private medical and dental colleges according to the study methods they prioritize Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted over a period of more than a year. At the confidence level of 95% and bound on error of 5%, a minimum sample size of 384 was calculated and sample size of 477 was finalized after allowing for a non-response rate of 24%. The convenience sampling technique was employed to select medical students. Data was collected using a structured, self- administered questionnaire in English language after a written Informed Consent was obtained from each participant. Data was analysed using SPSS version 20. The quantitative variables were represented as mean and standard deviation. The qualitative variables were represented as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square test of significance was applied for finding any significant differences. P-value of less than 0.05 was taken as significant. Result: The mean age of n=477 students was 21+/- 2 years. Majority were MBBS students, with 53% from public institutes. We found that 52% students preferred print medium, whereas 26% students preferred screens. There was an association between public sector colleges and preferring print medium (p= 0.0001). A significant association was found between gender and method of study (p=0.0001). Age was associated with preference for print medium (p=0.02), also higher level of study was associated with preferring print medium (p=0.001). Most students prioritized books (71%) but retained better with videos (63%). Most students (56%) preferred textbooks over reference books. Dr. Najeeb's videos were the most preferred videos (75%), furthermore, the most used site was Wikipedia (48%). Internet was the top source for preparing for PBLs (50%). Conclusion: The study showed that majority students still prefer print medium and prioritize books over other methods. Students claimed that they retain best with videos and books. So, increasing the use of videos for teaching is recommended. The Pandemic has necessitated the increased use of online teaching modalities. Students should be encouraged to use more reliable websites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印刷或电子:新一代医学和牙科学生的偏好
目的:评估卡拉奇医学和牙科学院本科生对印刷或电子媒体的偏好,并根据他们优先考虑的学习方法比较公立和私立医学和牙科学院的学生。方法:进行了一年多的横断面调查。在95%的置信水平和5%的误差限下,计算最小样本量为384,在考虑24%的无应答率后,最终样本量为477。采用方便抽样法对医学生进行抽样调查。在每位参与者获得书面知情同意后,使用结构化的、自我管理的英语问卷收集数据。数据分析采用SPSS version 20。定量变量用均值和标准差表示。定性变量用频率和百分比表示。采用卡方显著性检验来发现任何显著差异。p值小于0.05为显著性。结果:n=477名学生平均年龄为21±2岁。大多数是MBBS学生,其中53%来自公立学院。我们发现52%的学生更喜欢印刷媒体,而26%的学生更喜欢屏幕。公立学院与偏爱印刷媒体之间存在关联(p= 0.0001)。性别与研究方法之间存在显著相关性(p=0.0001)。年龄与对印刷介质的偏好相关(p=0.02),较高的学习水平与对印刷介质的偏好相关(p=0.001)。大多数学生优先选择书籍(71%),但视频(63%)保留得更好。大多数学生(56%)更喜欢教科书而不是参考书。Najeeb博士的视频是最受欢迎的视频(75%),此外,使用最多的网站是维基百科(48%)。互联网是pbl准备的主要来源(50%)。结论:研究表明,大多数学生仍然更喜欢纸质媒体,优先考虑书籍。学生们声称他们用视频和书本记忆效果最好。因此,建议增加视频教学的使用。大流行使得有必要更多地使用在线教学方式。应该鼓励学生使用更可靠的网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smokeless Tobacco A Deadly Addiction Stem Cell Role in Regenerative Dental Medicine Contraceptive Usage and Social Barriers During The Covid-19 Pandemic Surgical Repair of Nasal Vestibular Stenosis A Case Report COVID-19 Inside Out In-hospital Outcomes at a Public Sector Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1