Is Logic in the Mind or in the World? Why a Philosophical Question can Affect the Understanding of Intelligence

H. Sommer, Lothar Schreiber
{"title":"Is Logic in the Mind or in the World? Why a Philosophical Question can Affect the Understanding of Intelligence","authors":"H. Sommer, Lothar Schreiber","doi":"10.2478/v10229-011-0014-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Dreyfus' call ‘to make artificial intelligence (AI) more Heideggerian‘ echoes Heidegger's affirmation that pure calculations produce no ‘intelligence’ (Dreyfus, 2007). But what exactly is it that AI needs more than mathematics? The question in the title gives rise to a reexamination of the basic principles of cognition in Husserl's Phenomenology. Using Husserl's Phenomenological Method, a formalization of these principles is presented that provides the principal idea of cognition, and as a consequence, a ‘natural logic’. Only in a second step, mathematics is obtained from this natural logic by abstraction. The limitations of pure reasoning are demonstrated for fundamental considerations (Hilbert's ‘finite Einstellung’) as well as for the task of solving practical problems. Principles will be presented for the design of general intelligent systems, which make use of a natural logic.","PeriodicalId":247142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial General Intelligence","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial General Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/v10229-011-0014-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Dreyfus' call ‘to make artificial intelligence (AI) more Heideggerian‘ echoes Heidegger's affirmation that pure calculations produce no ‘intelligence’ (Dreyfus, 2007). But what exactly is it that AI needs more than mathematics? The question in the title gives rise to a reexamination of the basic principles of cognition in Husserl's Phenomenology. Using Husserl's Phenomenological Method, a formalization of these principles is presented that provides the principal idea of cognition, and as a consequence, a ‘natural logic’. Only in a second step, mathematics is obtained from this natural logic by abstraction. The limitations of pure reasoning are demonstrated for fundamental considerations (Hilbert's ‘finite Einstellung’) as well as for the task of solving practical problems. Principles will be presented for the design of general intelligent systems, which make use of a natural logic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逻辑是在头脑中还是在世界中?为什么一个哲学问题会影响对智力的理解
德雷福斯呼吁“让人工智能(AI)更加海德格尔式”,这与海德格尔断言纯粹的计算不会产生“智能”相呼应(德雷福斯,2007)。但除了数学,人工智能还需要什么?题目中的问题引起了对胡塞尔现象学中认识的基本原则的重新审视。利用胡塞尔的现象学方法,提出了这些原则的形式化,提供了认知的主要思想,并作为一个“自然逻辑”的结果。只有在第二步中,数学才能通过抽象从这种自然逻辑中得到。纯粹推理的局限性在基本考虑(希尔伯特的“有限爱因斯坦”)和解决实际问题的任务中都得到了证明。本文将介绍利用自然逻辑设计通用智能系统的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fuzzy Networks for Modeling Shared Semantic Knowledge Extending Environments to Measure Self-reflection in Reinforcement Learning Measuring Intelligence and Growth Rate: Variations on Hibbard’s Intelligence Measure Feature Reinforcement Learning: Part II. Structured MDPs The Synthesis and Decoding of Meaning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1