{"title":"BENEFITS AND RISKS OF ICTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS: AN ATTEMPT TO ANALYZE FREE DESCRIPTIVE ANSWERS","authors":"Y. Maruyama","doi":"10.33965/celda2019_201911c062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of an attempt to analyze the benefits and risks of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and their applications, as perceived by university students. A survey was conducted using questionnaire with a free descriptive answering format. Responses were analyzed via text mining and correspondence analysis; in this manner, explanations of students’ perceptions could be deduced. As the survey conducted here was preliminary, the sample size was small; further analysis with a larger number of participants is necessary.","PeriodicalId":385382,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2019)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2019_201911c062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an attempt to analyze the benefits and risks of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and their applications, as perceived by university students. A survey was conducted using questionnaire with a free descriptive answering format. Responses were analyzed via text mining and correspondence analysis; in this manner, explanations of students’ perceptions could be deduced. As the survey conducted here was preliminary, the sample size was small; further analysis with a larger number of participants is necessary.