Optimal Reinsurance Policies When the Interests of Both the Cedent and the Reinsurer are Taken into Account

Wenjun Jiang, Jiandong Ren, R. Zitikis
{"title":"Optimal Reinsurance Policies When the Interests of Both the Cedent and the Reinsurer are Taken into Account","authors":"Wenjun Jiang, Jiandong Ren, R. Zitikis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2840218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimal forms of reinsurance policies have been studied for a long time in actuarial literature. Most existing results are from the insurer's point of view, aiming at maximizing the expected utility or minimizing the risk of the insurer. However, as pointed out by Borch (1969), it is understandable that a reinsurance arrangement which might be very attractive to one party (e.g., insurer) can be quite unacceptable to the other party (e.g., reinsurer). In this paper, we follow this point of view and study forms of Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies whereby one party's risk, measured by its value-at-risk (VaR), cannot be reduced without increasing the VaR of the counter-party in the reinsurance transaction. We show that the Pareto-optimal policies can be determined by minimizing linear combinations of the VaRs of the two parties in the reinsurance transaction. Consequently, we succeed in deriving user-friendly, closed-form, optimal reinsurance policies and their parameter values.","PeriodicalId":203996,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Value-at-Risk (Topic)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Value-at-Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2840218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Optimal forms of reinsurance policies have been studied for a long time in actuarial literature. Most existing results are from the insurer's point of view, aiming at maximizing the expected utility or minimizing the risk of the insurer. However, as pointed out by Borch (1969), it is understandable that a reinsurance arrangement which might be very attractive to one party (e.g., insurer) can be quite unacceptable to the other party (e.g., reinsurer). In this paper, we follow this point of view and study forms of Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies whereby one party's risk, measured by its value-at-risk (VaR), cannot be reduced without increasing the VaR of the counter-party in the reinsurance transaction. We show that the Pareto-optimal policies can be determined by minimizing linear combinations of the VaRs of the two parties in the reinsurance transaction. Consequently, we succeed in deriving user-friendly, closed-form, optimal reinsurance policies and their parameter values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑分出人和再保险人利益的最优再保险策略
保险精算文献对再保险保单的最优形式进行了长期的研究。大多数现有的结果都是从保险人的角度出发,旨在使预期效用最大化或使保险人的风险最小化。然而,正如Borch(1969)所指出的那样,可以理解的是,对一方(如保险人)非常有吸引力的再保险安排可能对另一方(如再保险人)非常不可接受。本文遵循这一观点,研究了以风险价值(VaR)衡量的一方风险不能在不增加再保险交易对手VaR的情况下降低的帕累托最优再保险政策的形式。我们证明了通过最小化再保险交易中双方var的线性组合可以确定帕累托最优策略。因此,我们成功地推导出用户友好的、封闭的、最优的再保险策略及其参数值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Precommitted Strategies with Initial-time and Intermediate-time VaR Constraints Success and Failure of the Financial Regulation on a Surplus-Driven Financial Company Interpreting Expectiles Beyond Value at Risk for Developing Markets La importancia de medir el riesgo de liquidez con aplicaciones inteligentes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1