Nursing Students’ Perception and Attitude toward Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Oman

Shaikha Alamri, Iman Hamdoon Al Hashmi, Kholah Shruba, S. Jamaan, Zaina Alrahbi, Thuraiya Al kaabi
{"title":"Nursing Students’ Perception and Attitude toward Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Oman","authors":"Shaikha Alamri, Iman Hamdoon Al Hashmi, Kholah Shruba, S. Jamaan, Zaina Alrahbi, Thuraiya Al kaabi","doi":"10.18295/squmj.8.2021.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore undergraduate nursing students’ perception and attitude toward the OSCE. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between April-May 2020, among undergraduate nursing students in the College of Nursing at Sultan Qaboos University. Two self-administered questionnaires were employed to obtain data on students’ perception and attitude toward OSCE. Students’ feedback on OSCE was collected using open-ended questions about OSCE strengths, weakness, and recommendation for improvement. Surveys responses were based on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Students’ Feedback on OSCE was analyzed as descriptive data by identifying the common themes and categorize them in groups. Results: A total of 160 students completed the study questionnaires. Most agreed that OSCE atmosphere is not good (66.3%) and it shouldn’t be the only mode of practical Examination (40.6%). Also, 64.4% of the students felt that timing allocated to complete the skills was not adequate. The data shows that 33.1% of the examinees felt that OSCE examination is more stressful than clinical examination. In addition, few students supported that OSCE has improved their communication skills and it increased their confidence level to perform nursing skills. Conclusion: The findings of this study appear alarming in regard to students’ perception about the overall process and the validity of OSCE examination as an assessment method. Nursing educators need to consider further evaluation and improvement of the OSCE in order to improve students’ acceptance and appreciation of OSCE as an important form of clinical learning and as an assessment method. \nKeywords: Objective Structured Clinical Examination; Nursing Education; Baccalaureate; Evaluation; Attitude; Nursing Students; Practical Nursing.","PeriodicalId":214021,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal [SQUMJ]","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal [SQUMJ]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.8.2021.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To explore undergraduate nursing students’ perception and attitude toward the OSCE. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between April-May 2020, among undergraduate nursing students in the College of Nursing at Sultan Qaboos University. Two self-administered questionnaires were employed to obtain data on students’ perception and attitude toward OSCE. Students’ feedback on OSCE was collected using open-ended questions about OSCE strengths, weakness, and recommendation for improvement. Surveys responses were based on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Students’ Feedback on OSCE was analyzed as descriptive data by identifying the common themes and categorize them in groups. Results: A total of 160 students completed the study questionnaires. Most agreed that OSCE atmosphere is not good (66.3%) and it shouldn’t be the only mode of practical Examination (40.6%). Also, 64.4% of the students felt that timing allocated to complete the skills was not adequate. The data shows that 33.1% of the examinees felt that OSCE examination is more stressful than clinical examination. In addition, few students supported that OSCE has improved their communication skills and it increased their confidence level to perform nursing skills. Conclusion: The findings of this study appear alarming in regard to students’ perception about the overall process and the validity of OSCE examination as an assessment method. Nursing educators need to consider further evaluation and improvement of the OSCE in order to improve students’ acceptance and appreciation of OSCE as an important form of clinical learning and as an assessment method. Keywords: Objective Structured Clinical Examination; Nursing Education; Baccalaureate; Evaluation; Attitude; Nursing Students; Practical Nursing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿曼护生对客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)的认知与态度
目的:探讨本科护生对欧安组织的认知和态度。方法:本横断面描述性研究于2020年4月至5月在苏丹卡布斯大学护理学院的本科护理学生中进行。采用两份自填问卷,了解学生对欧安组织的认知和态度。学生对欧安组织的反馈是通过开放式问题收集的,这些问题涉及欧安组织的优势、劣势和改进建议。调查的回答是基于5分的顺序,从非常不同意到非常同意。通过确定共同主题并将其分组,将学生对欧安组织的反馈作为描述性数据进行分析。结果:共160名学生完成了研究问卷。大多数人认为欧安组织的氛围不好(66.3%),它不应该是实践考试的唯一模式(40.6%)。此外,64.4%的学生认为完成技能的时间分配不够。数据显示,33.1%的考生认为OSCE考试比临床考试压力更大。此外,很少有学生认为欧安组织提高了他们的沟通技巧,提高了他们执行护理技能的信心水平。结论:本研究的结果在学生对整个过程的看法和欧安组织考试作为一种评估方法的有效性方面显得令人震惊。护理教育工作者需要考虑进一步评估和改进OSCE,以提高学生对OSCE作为临床学习的重要形式和评估方法的接受和欣赏。关键词:目的结构化临床检验;护理教育;学士学位;评估;态度;护理学生;实际的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe Neonatal Presentation of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis Type 4 in an Omani Infant Nursing Students’ Perception and Attitude toward Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Oman Resuscitation & Research Conference 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1