When Tablets meet Tabletops: The Effect of Tabletop Size on Around-the-Table Collaboration with Personal Tablets

Johannes Zagermann, Ulrike Pfeil, Roman Rädle, Hans-Christian Jetter, C. Klokmose, Harald Reiterer
{"title":"When Tablets meet Tabletops: The Effect of Tabletop Size on Around-the-Table Collaboration with Personal Tablets","authors":"Johannes Zagermann, Ulrike Pfeil, Roman Rädle, Hans-Christian Jetter, C. Klokmose, Harald Reiterer","doi":"10.1145/2858036.2858224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-device collaboration with tablets is an increasingly popular topic in HCI. Previous work has shown that tablet-only collaboration can be improved by an additional shared workspace on an interactive tabletop. However, large tabletops are costly and need space, raising the question to what extent the physical size of shared horizontal surfaces really pays off. In order to analyse the suitability of smaller-than-tabletop devices (e.g. tablets) as a low-cost alternative, we studied the effect of the size of a shared horizontal interactive workspace on users' attention, awareness, and efficiency during cross-device collaboration. In our study, 15 groups of two users executed a sensemaking task with two personal tablets (9.7\") and a horizontal shared display of varying sizes (10.6\", 27\", and 55\"). Our findings show that different sizes lead to differences in participants' interaction with the tabletop and in the groups' communication styles. To our own surprise we found that larger tabletops do not necessarily improve collaboration or sensemaking results, because they can divert users' attention away from their collaborators and towards the shared display.","PeriodicalId":169608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"115 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Cross-device collaboration with tablets is an increasingly popular topic in HCI. Previous work has shown that tablet-only collaboration can be improved by an additional shared workspace on an interactive tabletop. However, large tabletops are costly and need space, raising the question to what extent the physical size of shared horizontal surfaces really pays off. In order to analyse the suitability of smaller-than-tabletop devices (e.g. tablets) as a low-cost alternative, we studied the effect of the size of a shared horizontal interactive workspace on users' attention, awareness, and efficiency during cross-device collaboration. In our study, 15 groups of two users executed a sensemaking task with two personal tablets (9.7") and a horizontal shared display of varying sizes (10.6", 27", and 55"). Our findings show that different sizes lead to differences in participants' interaction with the tabletop and in the groups' communication styles. To our own surprise we found that larger tabletops do not necessarily improve collaboration or sensemaking results, because they can divert users' attention away from their collaborators and towards the shared display.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当平板电脑与桌面相遇:桌面尺寸对使用个人平板电脑进行圆桌协作的影响
与平板电脑的跨设备协作是HCI中日益流行的话题。以前的研究表明,在交互式桌面上增加一个共享工作空间可以改善仅平板电脑的协作。然而,大型桌面既昂贵又需要空间,这就提出了一个问题,即共享水平表面的物理大小在多大程度上真正值得。为了分析比桌面小的设备(例如平板电脑)作为低成本替代品的适用性,我们研究了共享水平交互工作空间的大小对用户在跨设备协作期间的注意力、意识和效率的影响。在我们的研究中,15组2名用户使用两个个人平板电脑(9.7英寸)和一个不同尺寸的水平共享显示器(10.6英寸、27英寸和55英寸)执行一个语义生成任务。我们的研究结果表明,不同的大小导致参与者与桌面的互动和群体的沟通风格的差异。令我们吃惊的是,我们发现更大的桌面并不一定会提高协作或语义分析的结果,因为它们会将用户的注意力从合作者身上转移到共享显示上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism Proactive Sensing for Improving Hand Pose Estimation On Looking at the Vagina through Labella Simplified Audio Production in Asynchronous Voice-Based Discussions ShapeCanvas: An Exploration of Shape-Changing Content Generation by Members of the Public
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1