Hicrî İlk Dört Asırda Tefsir-Sözlük İlişkisi

ULUM Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.54659/ulum.801132
A. Uzun
{"title":"Hicrî İlk Dört Asırda Tefsir-Sözlük İlişkisi","authors":"A. Uzun","doi":"10.54659/ulum.801132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study on the field of early Tafsir (Qur’anic exegesis) history deals with the correlation between tafsir and classical Arabic dictionaries in the first four centuries of the Hijri. Examining the contact between the two disciplines allows the direction, nature and character of the relationship between the tafsir litera-ture and dictionaries to be revealed. For this purpose, the dictionaries and commentary materials of the first four centuries are first examined using the text analysis method. The strength of Arabic lexico-graphical activities in the first four centuries is evident from the many strong texts that were produced. The plentiful works from this period have made the preference of Arabic dictionaries necessary with their high representational value. The preference of dictionaries that can provide abundant data on Qur’anic interpretation is due to the fact that the main subject of the thesis is the study of the tafsir-dictionary relationship. The temporal limitation of the study being the first four centuries AH required a halt at the stage described as the peak age of Arabic dictionaries. Considering this temporal scheme has a positive effect on the point of observing the effect of historical periods. Moreover, if the sharh and hashiye period of dictionaries started in the 5th century AH, encountering a wide range of tafsir data in the first four centuries is to be expected. However, limiting the scope of the study to the first four centuries of the Hijri also has a negative side. The negative effect of this temporal limitation is the difficulty of determin-ing the relationship between species. This situation arises from the distribution of the types of works produced in this process. In other words, while commentaries in the first four centuries are generally positioned at the beginning of this process, the part concentrating on dictionaries corresponds to the end of this process. Therefore, while examining the effect of commentaries on dictionaries is possible, exam-ining the opposite effect of dictionaries on commentaries is difficult. Therefore, in order to observe the effect of dictionaries belonging to the first four centuries on tafsirs, examining tafsirs produced after the fourth century becomes necessary. As a matter of fact, linguistic commentaries having emerged in the fourth century is no coincidence, as this considered to be the period dictionaries emerged. For these works and their types to be free from the chain of interaction is unimaginable. Such exegeses focus on word analysis, Zamakhshari’s (d. 538/1144) al-Kashshāf, Abu Hayyan’s (d. 745/1344) al-Bahr al-muḥiṭ and Qurṭubī’s (d. 671/1273) al-Jāmiʻ li-aḥkām al-Qur’ān, indicate that past lexical accumulation had prepared the necessary conditions for the writing linguistic commentaries. The main aim of this doctoral dissertation in the field of tafsir is to reinforce the existence of the interactions between classical Arabic dictionaries and tafsirs from the first four centuries of the Hijri. Evidence of this shows, lexicography to have been open to the direction of tafsir reveals its intensive work on tafsir. Arabic dictionaries use of Qur’anic vers-es as a material for istishad had the aim of strengthening their own data. However, Qur’anic verses in the dictionaries were not used just to reinforce data. Istishad with Qur’anic verses also prepares a space for their interpretation. Therefore, rich data on tafsir, appear in classical Arabic dictionaries.","PeriodicalId":157960,"journal":{"name":"ULUM","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ULUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.801132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study on the field of early Tafsir (Qur’anic exegesis) history deals with the correlation between tafsir and classical Arabic dictionaries in the first four centuries of the Hijri. Examining the contact between the two disciplines allows the direction, nature and character of the relationship between the tafsir litera-ture and dictionaries to be revealed. For this purpose, the dictionaries and commentary materials of the first four centuries are first examined using the text analysis method. The strength of Arabic lexico-graphical activities in the first four centuries is evident from the many strong texts that were produced. The plentiful works from this period have made the preference of Arabic dictionaries necessary with their high representational value. The preference of dictionaries that can provide abundant data on Qur’anic interpretation is due to the fact that the main subject of the thesis is the study of the tafsir-dictionary relationship. The temporal limitation of the study being the first four centuries AH required a halt at the stage described as the peak age of Arabic dictionaries. Considering this temporal scheme has a positive effect on the point of observing the effect of historical periods. Moreover, if the sharh and hashiye period of dictionaries started in the 5th century AH, encountering a wide range of tafsir data in the first four centuries is to be expected. However, limiting the scope of the study to the first four centuries of the Hijri also has a negative side. The negative effect of this temporal limitation is the difficulty of determin-ing the relationship between species. This situation arises from the distribution of the types of works produced in this process. In other words, while commentaries in the first four centuries are generally positioned at the beginning of this process, the part concentrating on dictionaries corresponds to the end of this process. Therefore, while examining the effect of commentaries on dictionaries is possible, exam-ining the opposite effect of dictionaries on commentaries is difficult. Therefore, in order to observe the effect of dictionaries belonging to the first four centuries on tafsirs, examining tafsirs produced after the fourth century becomes necessary. As a matter of fact, linguistic commentaries having emerged in the fourth century is no coincidence, as this considered to be the period dictionaries emerged. For these works and their types to be free from the chain of interaction is unimaginable. Such exegeses focus on word analysis, Zamakhshari’s (d. 538/1144) al-Kashshāf, Abu Hayyan’s (d. 745/1344) al-Bahr al-muḥiṭ and Qurṭubī’s (d. 671/1273) al-Jāmiʻ li-aḥkām al-Qur’ān, indicate that past lexical accumulation had prepared the necessary conditions for the writing linguistic commentaries. The main aim of this doctoral dissertation in the field of tafsir is to reinforce the existence of the interactions between classical Arabic dictionaries and tafsirs from the first four centuries of the Hijri. Evidence of this shows, lexicography to have been open to the direction of tafsir reveals its intensive work on tafsir. Arabic dictionaries use of Qur’anic vers-es as a material for istishad had the aim of strengthening their own data. However, Qur’anic verses in the dictionaries were not used just to reinforce data. Istishad with Qur’anic verses also prepares a space for their interpretation. Therefore, rich data on tafsir, appear in classical Arabic dictionaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这项关于早期Tafsir(古兰经注释)历史领域的研究涉及Tafsir与Hijri的前四个世纪古典阿拉伯语词典之间的相关性。考察这两个学科之间的联系,可以揭示公务文献与词典关系的方向、性质和特征。为此,首先使用文本分析方法对前四个世纪的词典和注释材料进行研究。阿拉伯语词典编纂活动的力量在前四个世纪是显而易见的,从许多强有力的文本产生。这一时期的大量著作使得对阿拉伯语词典的偏爱具有很高的代表性价值。之所以选择能够提供丰富的《古兰经》解释资料的词典,是因为本文的主要研究对象是塔夫西尔与词典的关系。研究的时间限制是前四个世纪,需要在被描述为阿拉伯语词典的高峰时代的阶段暂停。考虑这种时间方案对观测历史时期的影响有积极的作用。此外,如果字典的sharh和hashiye时期开始于公元5世纪,那么在前四个世纪遇到广泛的工作数据是可以预期的。然而,将研究范围限制在Hijri的前四个世纪也有消极的一面。这种时间限制的负面影响是难以确定物种之间的关系。这种情况源于在这一过程中产生的作品类型的分布。换句话说,前四个世纪的注释通常位于这一过程的开始,而专注于词典的部分则对应于这一过程的结束。因此,虽然考察评注对词典的影响是可能的,但考察词典对评注的相反影响是困难的。因此,为了观察前四个世纪的词典对tafsirs的影响,研究四世纪以后产生的tafsirs是必要的。事实上,语言学注释出现在四世纪并非巧合,因为这被认为是词典出现的时期。让这些作品及其类型从互动链中解脱出来是不可想象的。Zamakhshari的(d. 538/1144) al-Kashshāf、Abu Hayyan的(d. 745/1344) al-Bahr的al-muḥiṭ和Qurṭubī的(d. 671/1273) al-Jāmi ha li-aḥkām al-Qur的ān这些注重单词分析的注释表明,过去的词汇积累为编写语言注释准备了必要的条件。本博士论文在tafsir领域的主要目的是加强经典阿拉伯语词典和tafsir之间的相互作用的存在,从头四个世纪的回历。这一证据表明,词典编纂已向工作方向开放,揭示了其对工作的深入研究。阿拉伯语词典使用古兰经经文作为伊斯兰教的材料,目的是加强他们自己的数据。然而,词典中的古兰经经文并不只是用来加强资料。伊斯兰教的《古兰经》经文也为他们的解释准备了空间。因此,在经典阿拉伯语词典中出现了丰富的关于tafsir的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığının Doğal Afetler Hakkındaki Yaklaşımı Hassa’nın Kuruluşu, Halep Vilayet Salnamelerine Göre İdarî, Sosyal ve Kültürel Durumu ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Shaʿrānī’s Ishari Tafsīr on Āyāt About Wuḍūʾ and Ṣalāt Evaluation of the Higher Religious Education in Turkey 1997-2020 Book Afetlerin Ceza Olduğunu Çağrıştıran Ayetlere Mâtürîdî’nin Yaklaşımı (Te’vîlâtü’l-Kur’ân Özelinde)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1