Formal analysis of cryptographic protocols by reasoning based on deontic relevant logic: A case study in Needham-Schroeder Shared-Key protocol

Kazunori Wagatsuma, Y. Goto, Jingde Cheng
{"title":"Formal analysis of cryptographic protocols by reasoning based on deontic relevant logic: A case study in Needham-Schroeder Shared-Key protocol","authors":"Kazunori Wagatsuma, Y. Goto, Jingde Cheng","doi":"10.1109/ICMLC.2012.6359660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formal analysis of cryptographic protocols is necessary to assure security before using it. In traditional approaches, analysts have to specify security goals or necessary conditions of the analysis firstly. However, it is difficult to specify all security goals or necessary conditions. A reasoning approach without the problem was proposed, but its concrete method is not established. In this paper, as the first step to elaborate the reasoning approach of cryptographic protocols, we analyzed Needham-Schroeder Shared-Key protocol by reasoning based on deontic relevant logic. By the case study, we show that the reasoning approach can find vulnerability of the cryptographic protocol as well as traditional approach, and can expect to find new vulnerability that has not been recognized. Then, we discuss about the concrete method for formal analysis of cryptographic protocols by the reasoning approach.","PeriodicalId":128006,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2012.6359660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Formal analysis of cryptographic protocols is necessary to assure security before using it. In traditional approaches, analysts have to specify security goals or necessary conditions of the analysis firstly. However, it is difficult to specify all security goals or necessary conditions. A reasoning approach without the problem was proposed, but its concrete method is not established. In this paper, as the first step to elaborate the reasoning approach of cryptographic protocols, we analyzed Needham-Schroeder Shared-Key protocol by reasoning based on deontic relevant logic. By the case study, we show that the reasoning approach can find vulnerability of the cryptographic protocol as well as traditional approach, and can expect to find new vulnerability that has not been recognized. Then, we discuss about the concrete method for formal analysis of cryptographic protocols by the reasoning approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于义务相关逻辑推理的密码协议形式化分析:以Needham-Schroeder共享密钥协议为例
在使用加密协议之前,必须对其进行形式化分析,以确保其安全性。在传统方法中,分析人员必须首先指定安全目标或分析的必要条件。然而,很难指定所有的安全目标或必要的条件。提出了一种不存在该问题的推理方法,但没有建立具体的方法。在本文中,作为阐述密码协议推理方法的第一步,我们通过基于道义相关逻辑的推理分析了Needham-Schroeder共享密钥协议。通过实例研究表明,推理方法可以像传统方法一样发现加密协议的漏洞,并有望发现尚未被识别的新漏洞。然后,我们讨论了用推理方法对密码协议进行形式化分析的具体方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ROBUST H∞ filtering for a class of nonlinear uncertain singular systems with time-varying delay Discriminati on between external short circuit and internal winding fault in power transformer using discrete wavelet transform and back-propagation neural network Hybrid linear and nonlinear weight Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm Transcriptional cooperativity in molecular dynamics based on normal mode analysis An efficient web document clustering algorithm for building dynamic similarity profile in Similarity-aware web caching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1