Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies Used in Putin's Speech at Annexation Ceremony

Aalaa Yaseen Hassan, Marwah Firas Abdullah Al-Rawe, Shaden Shamel Abdullah, Stéphane Hlaimi
{"title":"Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies Used in Putin's Speech at Annexation Ceremony","authors":"Aalaa Yaseen Hassan, Marwah Firas Abdullah Al-Rawe, Shaden Shamel Abdullah, Stéphane Hlaimi","doi":"10.18326/jopr.v5i2.153-167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the types of impoliteness strategies used in Putin's speech at the annexation ceremony. All of Putin's speeches were intentionally delivered to cause damage to the hearers' negative and positive faces. Culpeper's (2011) classifications of impoliteness, which consist of five strategies that are the opposite of politeness, were adopted. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses have been used to accomplish the study objectives. Putin mostly used the negative impoliteness strategy, directly attacking the West and their policies. Furthermore, he considered his authority to be higher than Kyiv and the West, and for this reason, he insulted, belittled, blamed, and accused them. In several texts, he used \"bald on record\" in a direct, concise, and clear tone when he talked to the President of Ukraine and his elites. The two remaining strategies, positive impoliteness and mock impoliteness, were rarely used. This work contributes to understanding the messages that Putin tried to convey and analyzes them politically.","PeriodicalId":143792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v5i2.153-167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the types of impoliteness strategies used in Putin's speech at the annexation ceremony. All of Putin's speeches were intentionally delivered to cause damage to the hearers' negative and positive faces. Culpeper's (2011) classifications of impoliteness, which consist of five strategies that are the opposite of politeness, were adopted. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses have been used to accomplish the study objectives. Putin mostly used the negative impoliteness strategy, directly attacking the West and their policies. Furthermore, he considered his authority to be higher than Kyiv and the West, and for this reason, he insulted, belittled, blamed, and accused them. In several texts, he used "bald on record" in a direct, concise, and clear tone when he talked to the President of Ukraine and his elites. The two remaining strategies, positive impoliteness and mock impoliteness, were rarely used. This work contributes to understanding the messages that Putin tried to convey and analyzes them politically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普京在兼并仪式上讲话中的不礼貌策略分析
本研究旨在探讨普京在吞并仪式上的讲话中使用的不礼貌策略类型。普京的所有演讲都是有意为之,以破坏听众的消极和积极的面孔。采用了Culpeper(2011)的不礼貌分类,其中包括与礼貌相反的五种策略。定性和定量分析都被用来完成研究目标。普京主要使用消极无礼策略,直接攻击西方及其政策。此外,他认为自己的权威高于基辅和西方,因此,他侮辱、贬低、指责和指责他们。在一些文本中,当他与乌克兰总统及其精英交谈时,他以直接,简洁和清晰的语气使用了“秃顶”。剩下的两种策略,积极不礼貌和模仿不礼貌,很少被使用。这项工作有助于理解普京试图传达的信息,并从政治上分析这些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking on Expressive Speech Act Realization in The Comments Section on YouTube Channel Relationship Between EFL Students' Implicature Competence and Their English Academic Success Across Gender English Imperialism: A Structural Form of Colonialism in the Intercultural Communication Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies Used in Putin's Speech at Annexation Ceremony Flouting Relevance Maxim Benefits of Hillary Clinton's President Candidate Debate on 2016
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1