Cognitive-load of activities for Māori and non-Māori: a New Zealand consensus

Spotlight on Exploratory Research in Health Pub Date : 2019-08-26 DOI:10.35831/sor.erh.08262019kz

Kristina Zawaly, N. Kerse, L. Tippett, S. Buetow

{"title":"Cognitive-load of activities for Māori and non-Māori: a New Zealand consensus","authors":"Kristina Zawaly, N. Kerse, L. Tippett, S. Buetow","doi":"10.35831/sor.erh.08262019kz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To estimate the cognitive-load of self-reported physical and cognitive activities by New Zealand’s (NZ) indigenous population (Māori) and non‑Māori from the Life and Living in Advanced Age‑Cohort Study New Zealand (LiLACS NZ).\nMethods: Three-round panel Delphi exercise in NZ involving six panellists across an expert rater group and a peer-rater agroup of Māori and non‑Māori respectively, via web-based and face‑to‑face discussion.\nResults: In Round i (pre-Delphi exercise) the investigator group, gathered and categorised data from LiLACS NZ and developed a 9-point Likert-scale to rate the cognitive-load. Round ii panellists each rated the cognitive‑load of each activity. If a priori specified criteria were not met, then round iii involved a face‑to‑face meeting to discuss and re-rate activities on which consensus was lacking.\nConclusions: Māori reached consensus in round ii while non‑Māori did so in round iii. Panellists provided a formal consensus-based cognitive-load rating for 181 activities separately for Māori and non‑Māori.\nKeywords: three to five keywords: Delphi Technique, physical activity, ageing, cognitive activity","PeriodicalId":265900,"journal":{"name":"Spotlight on Exploratory Research in Health","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spotlight on Exploratory Research in Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35831/sor.erh.08262019kz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: To estimate the cognitive-load of self-reported physical and cognitive activities by New Zealand’s (NZ) indigenous population (Māori) and non‑Māori from the Life and Living in Advanced Age‑Cohort Study New Zealand (LiLACS NZ). Methods: Three-round panel Delphi exercise in NZ involving six panellists across an expert rater group and a peer-rater agroup of Māori and non‑Māori respectively, via web-based and face‑to‑face discussion. Results: In Round i (pre-Delphi exercise) the investigator group, gathered and categorised data from LiLACS NZ and developed a 9-point Likert-scale to rate the cognitive-load. Round ii panellists each rated the cognitive‑load of each activity. If a priori specified criteria were not met, then round iii involved a face‑to‑face meeting to discuss and re-rate activities on which consensus was lacking. Conclusions: Māori reached consensus in round ii while non‑Māori did so in round iii. Panellists provided a formal consensus-based cognitive-load rating for 181 activities separately for Māori and non‑Māori. Keywords: three to five keywords: Delphi Technique, physical activity, ageing, cognitive activity

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Māori和non-Māori活动的认知负荷:新西兰共识

前言:估计新西兰(NZ)土著人口(Māori)和非Māori的自我报告的身体和认知活动的认知负荷，来自新西兰老年生活队列研究(LiLACS NZ)。方法:通过网络和面对面的讨论，在新西兰进行三轮小组德尔菲练习，涉及来自专家评议小组和同行评议小组Māori和非Māori的六名小组成员。结果:在第i轮(delphi前练习)中，研究小组收集并分类了来自LiLACS NZ的数据，并制定了9分李克特量表来评估认知负荷。第二轮的小组成员分别对每项活动的认知负荷进行打分。如果事先指定的标准没有得到满足，则第三轮涉及面对面会议，讨论和重新评价缺乏协商一致意见的活动。结论:Māori在第二轮中达成共识，而非Māori在第三轮中达成共识。小组成员分别为Māori和非Māori的181项活动提供了基于正式共识的认知负荷评级。关键词:三到五个关键词:德尔菲法，身体活动，衰老，认知活动

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Spotlight on Exploratory Research in Health

自引率

0.00%

发文量