Interpretable CNN for Single-Channel Artifacts Detection in Raw EEG Signals

F. Paissan, V. Kumaravel, Elisabetta Farella
{"title":"Interpretable CNN for Single-Channel Artifacts Detection in Raw EEG Signals","authors":"F. Paissan, V. Kumaravel, Elisabetta Farella","doi":"10.1109/SAS54819.2022.9881381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals recorded from the scalp are often affected by artifacts. Most existing artifact detection methods rely on multi-channel statistics such as inter-channel correlation. Recently, there has been a growing interest in realizing single-channel EEG systems to promote everyday use, demanding novel artifacts detection techniques. This paper presents validation results for single-channel artifacts detection in raw EEG signals using four neural architectures: a one-dimensional CNN (1D-CNN) - proposed by us, EEGNet, SincNet and EEGDenoiseNet. We used semi-synthetic EEG data corrupted with Ocular (EOG) and Myo-graphic (EMG) noise components to validate the approaches. Precisely, we contaminated the randomly chosen EEG channels with EOG and EMG artifacts in a controlled manner using a predefined Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) such that the ground truth is known. We validated these models both in terms of classification performance and the interpretability of the learned features. Of the four models, 1D-CNN, EEGNet, and SincNet achieved a comparable classification accuracy (around 99%) and EEGDenoiseNet achieved as low as 64%. Analysing the learned filters for interpretability, we found both 1D-CNN and EEGNet clearly separates EOG (Delta and Theta) and EMG (Gamma) frequency bands from EEG. Instead, SincNet prioritized to learn EEG-specific features (Alpha and Beta) rather than artifact-related information still achieiving the comparable performance as the other two models. EEGDenoiseNet with kernel width of 3 was excluded from this evaluation as it is practically infeasible to perform FFT analysis. Finally, we also computed the number of training parameters for each model to evaluate which among them would be suitable for a resource-constrained wearable device and we found that 1D-CNN and SincNet are the most parameter-efficient, although not by a large margin.","PeriodicalId":129732,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)","volume":"1999 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS54819.2022.9881381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals recorded from the scalp are often affected by artifacts. Most existing artifact detection methods rely on multi-channel statistics such as inter-channel correlation. Recently, there has been a growing interest in realizing single-channel EEG systems to promote everyday use, demanding novel artifacts detection techniques. This paper presents validation results for single-channel artifacts detection in raw EEG signals using four neural architectures: a one-dimensional CNN (1D-CNN) - proposed by us, EEGNet, SincNet and EEGDenoiseNet. We used semi-synthetic EEG data corrupted with Ocular (EOG) and Myo-graphic (EMG) noise components to validate the approaches. Precisely, we contaminated the randomly chosen EEG channels with EOG and EMG artifacts in a controlled manner using a predefined Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) such that the ground truth is known. We validated these models both in terms of classification performance and the interpretability of the learned features. Of the four models, 1D-CNN, EEGNet, and SincNet achieved a comparable classification accuracy (around 99%) and EEGDenoiseNet achieved as low as 64%. Analysing the learned filters for interpretability, we found both 1D-CNN and EEGNet clearly separates EOG (Delta and Theta) and EMG (Gamma) frequency bands from EEG. Instead, SincNet prioritized to learn EEG-specific features (Alpha and Beta) rather than artifact-related information still achieiving the comparable performance as the other two models. EEGDenoiseNet with kernel width of 3 was excluded from this evaluation as it is practically infeasible to perform FFT analysis. Finally, we also computed the number of training parameters for each model to evaluate which among them would be suitable for a resource-constrained wearable device and we found that 1D-CNN and SincNet are the most parameter-efficient, although not by a large margin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于原始脑电信号中单通道伪影检测的可解释CNN
从头皮记录的脑电图(EEG)信号经常受到伪影的影响。大多数现有的伪信号检测方法依赖于多通道统计,如通道间相关性。最近,人们对实现单通道脑电图系统以促进日常使用越来越感兴趣,这需要新的伪影检测技术。本文给出了使用我们提出的一维CNN (1D-CNN)、EEGNet、SincNet和EEGDenoiseNet四种神经结构对原始EEG信号进行单通道伪像检测的验证结果。我们使用了半合成的EEG数据,其中包括眼(EOG)和肌图(EMG)噪声成分来验证这些方法。准确地说,我们使用预定义的信噪比(SNR)以可控的方式将随机选择的EEG通道与EOG和EMG伪影污染,从而知道地面真相。我们从分类性能和学习特征的可解释性两方面验证了这些模型。在这四种模型中,1D-CNN、EEGNet和SincNet的分类准确率相当(约为99%),EEGDenoiseNet的分类准确率低至64%。分析学习到的滤波器的可解释性,我们发现1D-CNN和EEGNet都清楚地将EOG (Delta和Theta)和EMG (Gamma)频段从EEG中分离出来。相反,SincNet优先学习脑电图特定的特性(Alpha和Beta),而不是与工件相关的信息,仍然实现了与其他两个模型相当的性能。核宽度为3的EEGDenoiseNet被排除在本次评估之外,因为实际上无法进行FFT分析。最后,我们还计算了每个模型的训练参数数量,以评估其中哪个模型适合资源受限的可穿戴设备,我们发现1D-CNN和SincNet是参数效率最高的,尽管差距不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensor Data Communication via Light Guide Body for Monitoring Vehicle Batteries Automatic Extraction of Muscle Fascicle Pennation Angle from Raw Ultrasound Data Printed wireless battery-free sensor tag for structural health monitoring of natural fiber composites Improvement of Door Recognition Algorithm using Lidar and RGB-D camera for Mobile Manipulator Development of a neural network to identify plastics using Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1