Johnny can drag and drop: determining user intent through traditional interactions to improve desktop security

P. F. Wilbur, T. Deshane
{"title":"Johnny can drag and drop: determining user intent through traditional interactions to improve desktop security","authors":"P. F. Wilbur, T. Deshane","doi":"10.1145/1873561.1873565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we identify the primary difficulties encountered when security systems include users in the decision-making process. We propose security system inquiry mechanisms, designed around file open dialogs and drag-and-drop interfaces, to increase the accuracy of information obtained from users while also maintaining a high level of user inclusiveness in security decisions. We note that, although it has been previously shown that many users are inherently bad at making final security decisions, useful information regarding user intent can be accurately obtained by using our inquiry mechanisms. In particular, inquiry mechanisms that parallel the actions within applications the user actually intends to perform prompt the user in ways that are understandable and likely to receive accurate responses. We discuss how our system eliminates the traditional problems faced in security systems due to false positives and false negatives.","PeriodicalId":157379,"journal":{"name":"Computer Human Interaction for Management of Information Technology","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Human Interaction for Management of Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1873561.1873565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper, we identify the primary difficulties encountered when security systems include users in the decision-making process. We propose security system inquiry mechanisms, designed around file open dialogs and drag-and-drop interfaces, to increase the accuracy of information obtained from users while also maintaining a high level of user inclusiveness in security decisions. We note that, although it has been previously shown that many users are inherently bad at making final security decisions, useful information regarding user intent can be accurately obtained by using our inquiry mechanisms. In particular, inquiry mechanisms that parallel the actions within applications the user actually intends to perform prompt the user in ways that are understandable and likely to receive accurate responses. We discuss how our system eliminates the traditional problems faced in security systems due to false positives and false negatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Johnny可以拖放:通过传统的交互来确定用户意图,从而提高桌面安全性
在本文中,我们确定了当安全系统在决策过程中包含用户时遇到的主要困难。我们提出了围绕文件打开对话框和拖放界面设计的安全系统查询机制,以提高从用户获取信息的准确性,同时在安全决策中保持高水平的用户包容性。我们注意到,尽管之前的研究表明,许多用户天生不擅长做出最终的安全决策,但通过使用我们的查询机制,可以准确地获得有关用户意图的有用信息。特别是,与用户实际打算执行的应用程序中的操作并行的查询机制以可理解的方式提示用户,并可能收到准确的响应。我们讨论了我们的系统如何消除安全系统中由于误报和误报而面临的传统问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
People frames: the social construction of information systems Principles for applying social navigation to collaborative systems Transparent collaboration: letting users simulate another user's world Towards a task oriented method for accessing network based services Johnny can drag and drop: determining user intent through traditional interactions to improve desktop security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1