Undergraduate students’ perceptions of teachers’ written feedback in academic writing class: A survey study

N. Cahyani, Banatul Murtafi'ah
{"title":"Undergraduate students’ perceptions of teachers’ written feedback in academic writing class: A survey study","authors":"N. Cahyani, Banatul Murtafi'ah","doi":"10.21924/chss.2.2.2022.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This survey study aims to describe the students’ perception of teachers’ written feedback in an academic writing class in a private university in Indonesia. 119 students filled in the questionnaire on students’ perceptions of teachers’ written feedback adapted from Ouahidi and Lamkhanter (2020). A descriptive statistic measuring mean, frequency, and standard deviation were used to analyze the data from the questionnaire. The results showed that the teacher’s written feedback to the writing results in the academic writing class was useful and students did not find it difficult to understand any feedback given by the teacher. Most of the students answered often when being asked about their understanding to the feedback. Students were also able to use teacher comments to revise their writing. Revision and rewriting were also found as the follow-up activities that are most often done by students after receiving feedback. Then, it was also revealed that students preferred their teacher to give them correction with comments to all the major errors in their writing. In addition to the feedback, students also preferred their teachers to give praise and criticism. Regarding the correction of students' writing work, students preferred the teacher to correct the errors in content or ideas. Further implications and suggestions are also discussed in this article.","PeriodicalId":250246,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21924/chss.2.2.2022.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This survey study aims to describe the students’ perception of teachers’ written feedback in an academic writing class in a private university in Indonesia. 119 students filled in the questionnaire on students’ perceptions of teachers’ written feedback adapted from Ouahidi and Lamkhanter (2020). A descriptive statistic measuring mean, frequency, and standard deviation were used to analyze the data from the questionnaire. The results showed that the teacher’s written feedback to the writing results in the academic writing class was useful and students did not find it difficult to understand any feedback given by the teacher. Most of the students answered often when being asked about their understanding to the feedback. Students were also able to use teacher comments to revise their writing. Revision and rewriting were also found as the follow-up activities that are most often done by students after receiving feedback. Then, it was also revealed that students preferred their teacher to give them correction with comments to all the major errors in their writing. In addition to the feedback, students also preferred their teachers to give praise and criticism. Regarding the correction of students' writing work, students preferred the teacher to correct the errors in content or ideas. Further implications and suggestions are also discussed in this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生对学术写作课教师书面反馈的感知:一项调查研究
本调查研究旨在描述印度尼西亚一所私立大学学术写作课上学生对教师书面反馈的看法。119名学生填写了《学生对教师书面反馈的看法》问卷,改编自Ouahidi和Lamkhanter(2020)。采用描述性统计方法测量平均值、频率和标准差来分析问卷数据。结果表明,在学术写作课上,老师对写作结果的书面反馈是有用的,学生并不觉得老师给出的任何反馈都是难以理解的。当被问及他们对反馈的理解时,大多数学生经常回答。学生们还能够使用老师的评论来修改他们的写作。学生在收到反馈后最常做的后续活动是修改和重写。此外,调查还显示,学生们更喜欢老师对他们写作中的主要错误进行批改。除了反馈,学生也更喜欢老师给予表扬和批评。对于学生作文的批改,学生更倾向于老师批改内容或思想上的错误。本文还讨论了进一步的影响和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of social media influencers on brand awareness: A study on college students of Kolkata Examining the debate on government's communication strategies for covid-19 management in online media: A content analysis Constructive journalism and its effects on environmental discourses Bibliometric analysis on the international publication of muslim brotherhood Climate change communication in India: A study on climate change imageries on Instagram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1