Retrospective Analysis of Doxycycline or Bactrim Prophylaxis for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

S. Sekhsaria
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Doxycycline or Bactrim Prophylaxis for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"S. Sekhsaria","doi":"10.19080/ijoprs.2019.04.555628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Azithromycin prophylaxis has shown to decrease COPD exacerbations but led to hearing deficits. Therefore, there is a need to study other antibiotics as possible prophylaxis for COPD exacerbations. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of doxycycline or Bactrim prophylaxis for patients with moderate to severe COPD. Methods: We studied patients with moderate to severe COPD who were treated with prophylactic doxycycline or Bactrim in the fall and winter months along with their standard COPD therapy. From patient histories, we determined the number of exacerbations/year and hospitalizations/year prior to and after prophylaxis. Paired t-tests were used to analyze the data. Results: 17 patients with moderate to severe COPD on standard therapy were identified. Prophylactic doxycycline or Bactrim were added to their treatment regimens as a part of routine prophylaxis. Patients were on prophylaxis for a period of 6 months per year. The number of average exacerbations per year decreased from 4.44 ± 4.42 to 1.20 ± 1.0 (n=15, p=0.0047) and the number of hospitalizations per year decreased from 1.75 ± 1.12 to 0.00 ± 0 (n=5, p=0.0125). The number of exacerbations per person during the months with prophylaxis was 1.19 compared with 1.63 exacerbations per person during the months without prophylaxis (n=16, p=0.24). The antibiotics were well tolerated. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis showed a significant decrease in the number of exacerbations and hospitalizations per year for COPD patients undergoing doxycycline or Bactrim prophylaxis. This small study suggests the need for a prospective randomized study evaluating prophylactic doxycycline, Bactrim or other antibiotics in patients with moderate to severe COPD.","PeriodicalId":257243,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/ijoprs.2019.04.555628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Azithromycin prophylaxis has shown to decrease COPD exacerbations but led to hearing deficits. Therefore, there is a need to study other antibiotics as possible prophylaxis for COPD exacerbations. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of doxycycline or Bactrim prophylaxis for patients with moderate to severe COPD. Methods: We studied patients with moderate to severe COPD who were treated with prophylactic doxycycline or Bactrim in the fall and winter months along with their standard COPD therapy. From patient histories, we determined the number of exacerbations/year and hospitalizations/year prior to and after prophylaxis. Paired t-tests were used to analyze the data. Results: 17 patients with moderate to severe COPD on standard therapy were identified. Prophylactic doxycycline or Bactrim were added to their treatment regimens as a part of routine prophylaxis. Patients were on prophylaxis for a period of 6 months per year. The number of average exacerbations per year decreased from 4.44 ± 4.42 to 1.20 ± 1.0 (n=15, p=0.0047) and the number of hospitalizations per year decreased from 1.75 ± 1.12 to 0.00 ± 0 (n=5, p=0.0125). The number of exacerbations per person during the months with prophylaxis was 1.19 compared with 1.63 exacerbations per person during the months without prophylaxis (n=16, p=0.24). The antibiotics were well tolerated. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis showed a significant decrease in the number of exacerbations and hospitalizations per year for COPD patients undergoing doxycycline or Bactrim prophylaxis. This small study suggests the need for a prospective randomized study evaluating prophylactic doxycycline, Bactrim or other antibiotics in patients with moderate to severe COPD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多西环素或巴克特里预防慢性阻塞性肺疾病的回顾性分析
背景:阿奇霉素预防已显示可减少COPD恶化,但会导致听力障碍。因此,有必要研究其他可能预防COPD恶化的抗生素。目的:评价多西环素或Bactrim预防治疗中重度COPD患者的疗效。方法:我们研究了中重度COPD患者,他们在秋季和冬季接受预防性多西环素或Bactrim治疗,同时接受标准COPD治疗。根据患者的病史,我们确定了预防前后每年的恶化次数和住院次数。采用配对t检验对数据进行分析。结果:17例中重度COPD患者接受标准治疗。预防性多西环素或Bactrim被添加到他们的治疗方案作为常规预防的一部分。患者每年接受为期6个月的预防治疗。年平均加重次数从4.44±4.42次减少到1.20±1.0次(n=15, p=0.0047),年住院次数从1.75±1.12次减少到0.00±0次(n=5, p=0.0125)。预防治疗组人均加重次数为1.19次,未预防治疗组人均加重次数为1.63次(n=16, p=0.24)。抗生素耐受性良好。结论:这项回顾性分析显示,接受强力霉素或Bactrim预防治疗的COPD患者每年急性发作和住院次数显著减少。这项小型研究表明,有必要进行一项前瞻性随机研究,评估中度至重度COPD患者预防性多西环素、Bactrim或其他抗生素的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in A Young Patient with Strong Family Background Intermittent Silent Coronary Spasm with Variant Premature Ventricular Contractions, and QRS-Complex Fragmentation in COVID-19 Pneumonia with Stroke and Pleural Effusion; Serious Risk but a Good Outcome A Rare Case of Trapped Lung Cause by Chronic Pleural Effusion: Another Etiology of This Uncommon Disease Bullous Lung Disease in Young IV Drug Abuser: A Case Report Comparison of Specific Inhalation Challenge Test Results in Occupational and Non- Occupational Asthma Patients: Is Monitoring Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Sufficient for Diagnosis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1