Incremental Learning Models of Bike Counts at Bike Sharing Systems

M. Almannaa, Mohammed Elhenawy, F. Guo, H. Rakha
{"title":"Incremental Learning Models of Bike Counts at Bike Sharing Systems","authors":"M. Almannaa, Mohammed Elhenawy, F. Guo, H. Rakha","doi":"10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bike sharing systems (BSSs) have become a convenient and environmentally friendly transportation mode, but may suffer from logistical issues such as bike shortages at stations. Predicting bike counts would help mitigate imbalances in the system. Research has focused on global prediction techniques but has neglected the role of user incentives. We adopted two computational techniques to capture BSS dynamics: mini-batch gradient descent for the linear regression (MBGDLR) and locally weighted regression (LWR). The two approaches used incremental learning based only on the previous status of the station with neither weather nor time information. The models were applied to a BSS data set for one year (2014–2015) in the San Francisco Bay Area for different prediction windows. Both models gave comparable results. LWR performed slightly better than MBGDLR for all prediction windows. The smallest prediction error for LWR was 0.31 bikes/station (4% prediction error) for a 15-minute prediction window and 0.32 bikes/station for MBGDLR. The 120-minute prediction window had the largest prediction error of 1.1 bikes/station and 1.2 bikes/station for LWR and MBGDLR, respectively. Computationally, MBGDLR was 55 times faster than LWR and proved to be faster than other machine learning and time series algorithms.","PeriodicalId":395239,"journal":{"name":"2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Bike sharing systems (BSSs) have become a convenient and environmentally friendly transportation mode, but may suffer from logistical issues such as bike shortages at stations. Predicting bike counts would help mitigate imbalances in the system. Research has focused on global prediction techniques but has neglected the role of user incentives. We adopted two computational techniques to capture BSS dynamics: mini-batch gradient descent for the linear regression (MBGDLR) and locally weighted regression (LWR). The two approaches used incremental learning based only on the previous status of the station with neither weather nor time information. The models were applied to a BSS data set for one year (2014–2015) in the San Francisco Bay Area for different prediction windows. Both models gave comparable results. LWR performed slightly better than MBGDLR for all prediction windows. The smallest prediction error for LWR was 0.31 bikes/station (4% prediction error) for a 15-minute prediction window and 0.32 bikes/station for MBGDLR. The 120-minute prediction window had the largest prediction error of 1.1 bikes/station and 1.2 bikes/station for LWR and MBGDLR, respectively. Computationally, MBGDLR was 55 times faster than LWR and proved to be faster than other machine learning and time series algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享单车系统中自行车数量的增量学习模型
自行车共享系统(bss)已经成为一种方便和环保的交通方式,但可能会受到物流问题的困扰,比如车站的自行车短缺。预测自行车数量将有助于缓解系统中的不平衡。研究的重点是全局预测技术,但忽略了用户激励的作用。我们采用了两种计算技术来捕捉BSS动态:线性回归的小批量梯度下降(MBGDLR)和局部加权回归(LWR)。这两种方法都使用增量学习,只基于站点的先前状态,没有天气和时间信息。这些模型应用于旧金山湾区一年(2014-2015)的BSS数据集,用于不同的预测窗口。两种模型给出了相似的结果。LWR在所有预测窗口上的表现略好于MBGDLR。LWR在15分钟预测窗口内的最小预测误差为0.31个自行车/站(预测误差4%),MBGDLR的最小预测误差为0.32个自行车/站。LWR和MBGDLR在120分钟预测窗口的预测误差最大,分别为1.1和1.2自行车/站。在计算上,MBGDLR比LWR快55倍,并且被证明比其他机器学习和时间序列算法更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of Small Satellites and Connected Vehicles for Large-Scale Traffic Monitoring in Road Network Applications of train routing selection methods for real-time railway traffic management To Merge Early or Late: Analysis of Traffic Flow and Energy Impact in a Reduced Lane Scenario Future Mobility Sensing: An Intelligent Mobility Data Collection and Visualization Platform Large Scale Performance Assessment of the Lighthill-Whitham-Richards Model on a Smart Motorway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1