The Experiences of Public Rental Housing Policy of the Advanced Countries and Korea’s Policy Direction

Soo-Hyun Kim
{"title":"The Experiences of Public Rental Housing Policy of the Advanced Countries and Korea’s Policy Direction","authors":"Soo-Hyun Kim","doi":"10.24957/hsr.2022.30.4.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the end of the World War II, many advanced countries have developed public rental housing not only as a residential safety net but also as an active welfare policy. However, after 30-40 years of expansion, most of the advanced countries have reduced or retreated from public rental housing policies due to the development of the private housing market and financial constraints. On the other hand, Korea started its public rental housing policy late compared to the advanced countries and is still expanding it. Korea's public rental housing policy differs from the advanced countries in that housing market instability and the mass supply of housing to resolve it are the most important policy drivers. This paper tried to consider Korea's position, characteristics, and policy tasks in light of the changes in public rental housing policy in the advanced countries. Considering the experiences of the advanced countries, it is reasonable to assume that the quantitative target of our public rental housing policy is 10% of all households, and it is necessary to maintain the Korean characteristic of diversifying the number of tenants. The relationship between housing benefits and public rental housing needs to be established urgently. In addition, pointing out that hasty expectations are reflected in the current public rental housing statistics in Korea, this paper proposed to classify Jeonse public rental as one of the rental subsidy systems.","PeriodicalId":255849,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association for Housing Policy Studies","volume":"262 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association for Housing Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24957/hsr.2022.30.4.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the end of the World War II, many advanced countries have developed public rental housing not only as a residential safety net but also as an active welfare policy. However, after 30-40 years of expansion, most of the advanced countries have reduced or retreated from public rental housing policies due to the development of the private housing market and financial constraints. On the other hand, Korea started its public rental housing policy late compared to the advanced countries and is still expanding it. Korea's public rental housing policy differs from the advanced countries in that housing market instability and the mass supply of housing to resolve it are the most important policy drivers. This paper tried to consider Korea's position, characteristics, and policy tasks in light of the changes in public rental housing policy in the advanced countries. Considering the experiences of the advanced countries, it is reasonable to assume that the quantitative target of our public rental housing policy is 10% of all households, and it is necessary to maintain the Korean characteristic of diversifying the number of tenants. The relationship between housing benefits and public rental housing needs to be established urgently. In addition, pointing out that hasty expectations are reflected in the current public rental housing statistics in Korea, this paper proposed to classify Jeonse public rental as one of the rental subsidy systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发达国家公共租赁住房政策的经验与韩国的政策方向
自第二次世界大战结束以来,许多发达国家发展公共租赁住房不仅是作为一种居住安全网,而且是一种积极的福利政策。然而,经过30-40年的扩张,大多数发达国家由于私人住房市场的发展和财政约束,都减少或退出了公租房政策。相反,与发达国家相比,韩国的公共租赁住宅政策起步较晚,而且还在不断扩大。韩国的公共租赁住宅政策与发达国家的不同之处在于,住宅市场的不稳定和为解决这一问题而大量供应住宅是最重要的政策动力。本文试图结合发达国家公共租赁住房政策的变化来思考韩国的地位、特点和政策任务。考虑到发达国家的经验,我们的公共租赁住宅政策的数量目标是所有家庭的10%,这是合理的,而且有必要保持住户数量多样化的韩国特色。住房福利与公共租赁住房的关系亟待建立。此外,该论文还指出,目前韩国的公共租赁住宅统计中反映出草率的预期,并建议将全租公共租赁划为租赁补贴制度之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Relationship Between Apartment Sale Price, Jeonse Price, Monthly Rent Price Volatility Determinants: Focusing on the Loan Interest Rate Social Network Analysis of Real Estate Transactions in Korea Analysis of Decision Factors in the Utilization of Closed School Housing Conditions and Demand for Youth Households by Life-Cycle Changes: Using the 2002 Survey on Youth Living A Study on the Preferred Residential Models of Middle-Aged and Elderly Households after Retirement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1