Renegotiating the Charitable Deduction

Alexander Reid
{"title":"Renegotiating the Charitable Deduction","authors":"Alexander Reid","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2155994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The charitable contribution deduction is in peril, a potential casualty in the looming budget wars of 2013. All of the major tax reform proposals, from President Obama and Governor Romney to the Bowles-Simpson Deficit Commission, call for modifying, capping, or eliminating the charitable deduction to pay for tax cuts, spending or both. With its passing, charitable organizations will lose an important source of financial support, but we as Americans stand to lose much more than that. The charitable deduction protects our freedom to create, fund, and operate the institutions that make up American civil society with minimal interference from the government. It is a negotiated bargain between citizens and the state, establishing a delicate balance of power. Much as we might like to see balanced budgets and low tax rates in the short term, sacrificing the charitable deduction is not the best means of accomplishing these priorities. This paper argues that the appropriation of revenue by the federal government from the nonprofit sector by altering the charitable deduction entails a profound renegotiation of the relationship between the government and civil society, and it runs counter to the policy and spirit of American democracy.","PeriodicalId":408504,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Financing System (Payroll Tax","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Financing System (Payroll Tax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2155994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The charitable contribution deduction is in peril, a potential casualty in the looming budget wars of 2013. All of the major tax reform proposals, from President Obama and Governor Romney to the Bowles-Simpson Deficit Commission, call for modifying, capping, or eliminating the charitable deduction to pay for tax cuts, spending or both. With its passing, charitable organizations will lose an important source of financial support, but we as Americans stand to lose much more than that. The charitable deduction protects our freedom to create, fund, and operate the institutions that make up American civil society with minimal interference from the government. It is a negotiated bargain between citizens and the state, establishing a delicate balance of power. Much as we might like to see balanced budgets and low tax rates in the short term, sacrificing the charitable deduction is not the best means of accomplishing these priorities. This paper argues that the appropriation of revenue by the federal government from the nonprofit sector by altering the charitable deduction entails a profound renegotiation of the relationship between the government and civil society, and it runs counter to the policy and spirit of American democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新协商慈善扣除
慈善捐款的扣减正处于危险之中,在2013年迫在眉睫的预算战争中,这是一个潜在的牺牲品。从奥巴马总统和罗姆尼州长到鲍尔斯-辛普森赤字委员会,所有主要的税收改革提案都要求修改、限制或取消慈善扣除,以支付减税、支出或两者兼而有之。随着法案的通过,慈善组织将失去一个重要的财政支持来源,但我们作为美国人失去的远不止于此。慈善扣除额保护了我们创建、资助和运营构成美国公民社会的机构的自由,使政府的干预降到最低。这是公民与国家之间协商达成的协议,建立了微妙的权力平衡。尽管我们可能希望在短期内看到平衡的预算和低税率,但牺牲慈善扣除并不是实现这些优先事项的最佳手段。本文认为,联邦政府通过改变慈善扣除方式从非营利部门挪用收入,需要对政府与公民社会之间的关系进行深刻的重新谈判,这与美国民主的政策和精神背道而驰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Insurance with Rank-Dependent Utility and Increasing Indemnities Renegotiating the Charitable Deduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1