A. Chatziioannou, Y. Tai, Y. Shao, N. Doshi, B. Silverman, K. Meadors, S. Cherry
{"title":"Coincidence measurements on detectors for microPET II: a 1 mm/sup 3/ resolution PET scanner for small animal imaging","authors":"A. Chatziioannou, Y. Tai, Y. Shao, N. Doshi, B. Silverman, K. Meadors, S. Cherry","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2000.949333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only received as follows: The authors are currently developing a small animal PET scanner with a design goal of 1 mm/sup 3/ image resolution. They have built 3 pairs of detectors and tested performance in terms of crystal identification, spatial, energy and timing resolution. The detectors consisted of 12/spl times/12 arrays of 1/spl times/1/spl times/10 mm LSO crystals (1.15 mm pitch) coupled to Hamamatsu H7546 64 channel PMTs via 5 cm long coherent glass fiber bundles. Optical fiber connection is necessary to allow high packing fraction in a ring geometry scanner. Fiber bundles with and without extramural absorber (EMA) were tested. The results demonstrated an intrinsic spatial resolution of 1.12 mm (direct coupled LSO array), 1.23 mm (bundle without EMA) and 1.27 mm (bundle with EMA) using a -500 micron diameter Na-22 source. Using a 330 micron line source filled with F-18, intrinsic resolution for the EMA bundle improved to 1.05 mm. The respective timing and energy resolution values were 1.96 ns, 21% (direct coupled), 2.20 ns, 23% (bundle without EMA) and 2.99 ns, 30% (bundle with EMA). Peak-to-valley ratio in the flood histograms was better with EMA (5:1) compared to the bundle without EMA (2.1:1). These detectors substantially improve on the performance characteristics of the detectors in the authors' current microPET scanner.","PeriodicalId":445100,"journal":{"name":"2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2000.949333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Summary form only received as follows: The authors are currently developing a small animal PET scanner with a design goal of 1 mm/sup 3/ image resolution. They have built 3 pairs of detectors and tested performance in terms of crystal identification, spatial, energy and timing resolution. The detectors consisted of 12/spl times/12 arrays of 1/spl times/1/spl times/10 mm LSO crystals (1.15 mm pitch) coupled to Hamamatsu H7546 64 channel PMTs via 5 cm long coherent glass fiber bundles. Optical fiber connection is necessary to allow high packing fraction in a ring geometry scanner. Fiber bundles with and without extramural absorber (EMA) were tested. The results demonstrated an intrinsic spatial resolution of 1.12 mm (direct coupled LSO array), 1.23 mm (bundle without EMA) and 1.27 mm (bundle with EMA) using a -500 micron diameter Na-22 source. Using a 330 micron line source filled with F-18, intrinsic resolution for the EMA bundle improved to 1.05 mm. The respective timing and energy resolution values were 1.96 ns, 21% (direct coupled), 2.20 ns, 23% (bundle without EMA) and 2.99 ns, 30% (bundle with EMA). Peak-to-valley ratio in the flood histograms was better with EMA (5:1) compared to the bundle without EMA (2.1:1). These detectors substantially improve on the performance characteristics of the detectors in the authors' current microPET scanner.