A Fuzzy Statistical Perspective for Empirical Evaluation of EEG Classification Models for Epileptic Seizures

Renuka D. Suryawanshi, S. Vanjale, M. Vanjale
{"title":"A Fuzzy Statistical Perspective for Empirical Evaluation of EEG Classification Models for Epileptic Seizures","authors":"Renuka D. Suryawanshi, S. Vanjale, M. Vanjale","doi":"10.1109/ESCI53509.2022.9758337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electroencephalography (EEG) signals are a combination of complex pattern sequences, which are periodic in nature. These pattern sequences include a gamma waves that indicates deep thinking behaviour, a beta wave sequence that indicates busy and active mind status, an alpha wave segment which indicates reflective and restful behaviour, a theta wave which is an indicative of drowsiness, and a delta wave which indicates sleeping & dreaming conditions. Features like frequency changes, amplitude changes, pattern changes, etc. are used to identify chronic, ischemic and other diseases related to the brain. In order to classify these wave patterns into brain diseases like epilepsy, a series of high complexity signal processing operations are needed to be executed in tandem. These operations include signal pre-processing, feature extraction, feature selection, classification into epileptic & non-epileptic seizure and post-processing. A large variety of algorithms are developed by researchers for each of these operations. Performance of these algorithms varies largely w.r.t. the number of leads used for EEG capture, filtering efficiency, feature extraction & selection efficiency, and classifier efficiency. Thus, it becomes ambiguous for researchers and system designers to select the best possible algorithm set for their application. In order to reduce the ambiguity, this text provides a comprehensive comparison of a wide variety of epileptic & non-epileptic seizure classification system models. These models are statistically compared on the basis of overall accuracy, delay of decision making, precision, recall, f-measure and field of application. It is observed that convolutional neural network (CNN) based models outperform other models in terms of general-purpose performance, while specialized CNN models must be used for application specific deployments.","PeriodicalId":436539,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI53509.2022.9758337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) signals are a combination of complex pattern sequences, which are periodic in nature. These pattern sequences include a gamma waves that indicates deep thinking behaviour, a beta wave sequence that indicates busy and active mind status, an alpha wave segment which indicates reflective and restful behaviour, a theta wave which is an indicative of drowsiness, and a delta wave which indicates sleeping & dreaming conditions. Features like frequency changes, amplitude changes, pattern changes, etc. are used to identify chronic, ischemic and other diseases related to the brain. In order to classify these wave patterns into brain diseases like epilepsy, a series of high complexity signal processing operations are needed to be executed in tandem. These operations include signal pre-processing, feature extraction, feature selection, classification into epileptic & non-epileptic seizure and post-processing. A large variety of algorithms are developed by researchers for each of these operations. Performance of these algorithms varies largely w.r.t. the number of leads used for EEG capture, filtering efficiency, feature extraction & selection efficiency, and classifier efficiency. Thus, it becomes ambiguous for researchers and system designers to select the best possible algorithm set for their application. In order to reduce the ambiguity, this text provides a comprehensive comparison of a wide variety of epileptic & non-epileptic seizure classification system models. These models are statistically compared on the basis of overall accuracy, delay of decision making, precision, recall, f-measure and field of application. It is observed that convolutional neural network (CNN) based models outperform other models in terms of general-purpose performance, while specialized CNN models must be used for application specific deployments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模糊统计的癫痫发作脑电分类模型实证评价
脑电图(EEG)信号是复杂模式序列的组合,本质上具有周期性。这些模式序列包括表明深度思考行为的伽马波,表明忙碌和活跃思维状态的β波序列,表明反思和休息行为的α波片段,表明困倦的θ波,以及表明睡眠和做梦状态的δ波。频率变化、幅度变化、模式变化等特征被用来识别慢性、缺血性和其他与大脑有关的疾病。为了将这些脑电波模式归类为癫痫等脑部疾病,需要同时执行一系列高度复杂的信号处理操作。这些操作包括信号预处理、特征提取、特征选择、癫痫和非癫痫发作的分类以及后处理。研究人员针对这些操作开发了各种各样的算法。这些算法的性能在很大程度上取决于用于EEG捕获的导联数量、过滤效率、特征提取和选择效率以及分类器效率。因此,对于研究人员和系统设计者来说,为他们的应用选择最佳可能的算法集变得模棱两可。为了减少歧义,本文提供了各种癫痫和非癫痫发作分类系统模型的全面比较。对这些模型在总体准确率、决策延迟、精密度、召回率、f-测度和应用领域等方面进行了统计比较。我们观察到,基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的模型在通用性能方面优于其他模型,而专门的CNN模型必须用于特定应用的部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maximum Response Mechanism in Vehicular Cooperative Caching for C-V2X Networks A Modified Multiband Antenna for 5G Communication Deep Learning-Based Comparative Study to Detect Polyp Removal in Endoscopic Images A Multiple Stage Deep Learning Model for NID in MANETs Automated Diagnosis of Pneumonia through Capsule Network in conjunction with ResNet50v2 model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1