Comparative Study of Placebo Versus Metronidazole as a Role of Pain Relief Post Hemorrhoidectomy

Rooh Ali Ghumro, Sughra Parveen, Dileep Kumar, Kanwal Hanif, Abdul Wheed, Jahangir Ali Soomro
{"title":"Comparative Study of Placebo Versus Metronidazole as a Role of Pain Relief Post Hemorrhoidectomy","authors":"Rooh Ali Ghumro, Sughra Parveen, Dileep Kumar, Kanwal Hanif, Abdul Wheed, Jahangir Ali Soomro","doi":"10.48036/apims.v19i2.782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the role of metronidazole versus placebo in terms of pain relief post hemorrhoidectomy.\nMethodology: This randomized control trial was done at the general surgery department of PUMHS from January 2022 to July 2022. The study included adult patients of both genders, aged 18-60, who underwent surgeries for grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids. The participants were divided into two groups: a control group and an intervention group that received oral metronidazole for seven days postoperatively. Both groups received a standardized post-operative analgesic treatment. Post-operative pain and its severity were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were collected using a study proforma, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.\nResults: A total of 60 cases of hemorrhoids were comparatively studied; mean age of the case group was 39.36+10.43 years and the mean age of the control group was 35.33+9.35 years (p=0.120).  The mean BMI and average disease duration was statistically insignificant according to both groups (p > 0.05). In the cases group, grade III hemorrhoids were 36.7% and grade IV hemorrhoids were 63.3%, while in the control group, grade III hemorrhoids were 46.7% and grade IV hemorrhoids were 53.3% (p=0121). The mean operative time was almost similar in both groups (p=0.515). Average VAS was significantly decreased in the case group after 2 hours, at 24 hours, at 36 hours, and at 48 hours (p=<0.05), while it was statistically insignificant according to both groups at the 7th post-operative day (p=0.091).\nConclusion: The use of oral or topical metronidazole in the post-operative period concludes to be more effective in terms of clinically significant early pain relief.","PeriodicalId":184398,"journal":{"name":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v19i2.782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the role of metronidazole versus placebo in terms of pain relief post hemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized control trial was done at the general surgery department of PUMHS from January 2022 to July 2022. The study included adult patients of both genders, aged 18-60, who underwent surgeries for grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids. The participants were divided into two groups: a control group and an intervention group that received oral metronidazole for seven days postoperatively. Both groups received a standardized post-operative analgesic treatment. Post-operative pain and its severity were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were collected using a study proforma, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. Results: A total of 60 cases of hemorrhoids were comparatively studied; mean age of the case group was 39.36+10.43 years and the mean age of the control group was 35.33+9.35 years (p=0.120).  The mean BMI and average disease duration was statistically insignificant according to both groups (p > 0.05). In the cases group, grade III hemorrhoids were 36.7% and grade IV hemorrhoids were 63.3%, while in the control group, grade III hemorrhoids were 46.7% and grade IV hemorrhoids were 53.3% (p=0121). The mean operative time was almost similar in both groups (p=0.515). Average VAS was significantly decreased in the case group after 2 hours, at 24 hours, at 36 hours, and at 48 hours (p=<0.05), while it was statistically insignificant according to both groups at the 7th post-operative day (p=0.091). Conclusion: The use of oral or topical metronidazole in the post-operative period concludes to be more effective in terms of clinically significant early pain relief.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安慰剂与甲硝唑对痔疮切除术后疼痛缓解作用的比较研究
目的:评价甲硝唑与安慰剂在痔疮切除术后疼痛缓解方面的作用。方法:该随机对照试验于2022年1月至2022年7月在PUMHS普外科进行。该研究包括年龄在18-60岁之间,接受过III级和IV级痔疮手术的成年患者。参与者被分为两组:对照组和干预组,术后口服甲硝唑7天。两组术后均给予标准化的镇痛治疗。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术后疼痛及其严重程度。数据收集采用研究形式表,统计分析采用SPSS version 26。结果:共对60例痔疮进行了比较研究;病例组平均年龄为39.36+10.43岁,对照组平均年龄为35.33+9.35岁(p=0.120)。两组患者的平均BMI和平均病程差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。病例组中,III级占36.7%,IV级占63.3%,而对照组中,III级占46.7%,IV级占53.3% (p=0121)。两组患者平均手术时间差异无统计学意义(p=0.515)。病例组在术后2小时、24小时、36小时、48小时平均VAS均显著降低(p=<0.05),而两组在术后第7天差异无统计学意义(p=0.091)。结论:术后口服或外用甲硝唑能较好地缓解早期疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hepatoprotective Potential of Micronutrients Against Methotrexate-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Experimental Mice Model Impact of 3D virtual reality on teaching and learning human anatomy among undergraduate students Comparison of Effects of Preserved and Preservative Free Anti-Glaucoma Drugs in Causing Dry Eyes Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and its Correlation with Liver Function Test Comparison of Hemodynamic Effect of Propofol and Ketofol during Induction of Anaesthesia in General Surgery Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1