Languages of Memory: Toward Complementarity of the Mnemonic Spheres of the Algerian War

Brahim El Guabli
{"title":"Languages of Memory: Toward Complementarity of the Mnemonic Spheres of the Algerian War","authors":"Brahim El Guabli","doi":"10.3138/YCL.62.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The Algerian War (1954–1962) has elicited much scholarly attention in recent years. From the unearthing of the silenced 17 October 1961 events in Paris to the study the Algerian War's transformation of France, scholars have investigated different aspects of the war. However, scholarship has mainly placed agency with France. This was a result of the focus on French and francophone production at the expense of cultural production in local, non-colonial languages, which articulated local versions of the memories of the Algerian War. I argue that the ongoing debates about the complementarity of languages in the Maghreb provide a fitting framework to theorize how what I call intra-French, Franco-Algerian, and intra-Algerian mnemonic spheres of war complement each other. In emphasizing the centrality of language in my conceptualization of mnemonic spheres and their complementarity, I bring attention to the ethical necessity of juxtaposing cultural production in Amazigh, Arabic, Darija (colloquial Arabic of the Maghreb), and French for the study of memories of this transformative war. Not only does this approach reveal the complexity of war and its memories, but it also demonstrates that Algerians have portrayed their memories of war through their local languages, thus turning them into sites of their mnemonic agency.","PeriodicalId":342699,"journal":{"name":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/YCL.62.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The Algerian War (1954–1962) has elicited much scholarly attention in recent years. From the unearthing of the silenced 17 October 1961 events in Paris to the study the Algerian War's transformation of France, scholars have investigated different aspects of the war. However, scholarship has mainly placed agency with France. This was a result of the focus on French and francophone production at the expense of cultural production in local, non-colonial languages, which articulated local versions of the memories of the Algerian War. I argue that the ongoing debates about the complementarity of languages in the Maghreb provide a fitting framework to theorize how what I call intra-French, Franco-Algerian, and intra-Algerian mnemonic spheres of war complement each other. In emphasizing the centrality of language in my conceptualization of mnemonic spheres and their complementarity, I bring attention to the ethical necessity of juxtaposing cultural production in Amazigh, Arabic, Darija (colloquial Arabic of the Maghreb), and French for the study of memories of this transformative war. Not only does this approach reveal the complexity of war and its memories, but it also demonstrates that Algerians have portrayed their memories of war through their local languages, thus turning them into sites of their mnemonic agency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记忆语言:阿尔及利亚战争中记忆领域的互补性
摘要:阿尔及利亚战争(1954-1962)近年来引起了学术界的广泛关注。从发掘1961年10月17日在巴黎发生的沉默事件到研究阿尔及利亚战争对法国的转变,学者们研究了这场战争的不同方面。然而,奖学金主要由法国代理。这是以牺牲当地非殖民语言的文化生产为代价关注法语和法语生产的结果,这些文化生产表达了阿尔及利亚战争记忆的当地版本。我认为,正在进行的关于马格里布地区语言互补性的辩论提供了一个合适的框架,来理论化我所说的法语内部、法国-阿尔及利亚和阿尔及利亚内部的助记法战争领域如何相互补充。在强调语言在我的记忆领域概念化及其互补性中的中心地位时,我将注意力集中在将阿马齐格语、阿拉伯语、达利加语(马格里布的口语化阿拉伯语)和法语的文化生产并置的伦理必要性上,以研究这场变革战争的记忆。这种方法不仅揭示了战争及其记忆的复杂性,而且还表明阿尔及利亚人通过他们的当地语言描绘了他们对战争的记忆,从而将它们变成了他们记忆的场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“A Stratagem for Self-Oblivion”: Rosselli, Real Talk, and the Abolition of the “I” Foreign Poems Damage and Repair in Environmental Assessment A Seafloor for the Disaster Receding Margins: Black Rice and the Rhythms of Tidal Transfer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1