Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity

O. Faugeras, G. Pagès
{"title":"Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity","authors":"O. Faugeras, G. Pagès","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3854467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable <i>X</i> by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures (<i>m<sub>X</sub>, p<sub>X</sub></i>). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes <i>x</i> of <i>X</i> tell how high are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities <i>P(X = x)</i> reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity <i>mX</i> and the propensity <i>pX</i> of the real-valued risk <i>X</i>. This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects.<br><br>In its simplest form, <i>(m<sub>X</sub>, p <sub>X</sub>)</i> is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law <i>P<sup>X</sup></i> of <i>X</i> to a two-points {0,<i>m<sub>X</sub></i>} discrete distribution with mass <i>p<sub>X</sub></i> at <i>m<sub>X</sub></i>. The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. <br><br>This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":306152,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable X by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures (mX, pX). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes x of X tell how high are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities P(X = x) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity mX and the propensity pX of the real-valued risk X. This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects.

In its simplest form, (mX, p X) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law PX of X to a two-points {0,mX} discrete distribution with mass pX at mX. The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem.

This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险量化的大小和倾向
我们提出了一种评估随机风险变量X的新方法,通过引入幅度倾向风险度量(mX, pX)。这种双变量度量旨在解释风险的双重方面,其中x的大小x表明所发生的损失有多高,而概率P(x = x)则表明人们预计遭受此类损失的频率。其基本思想是同时量化实值风险x的严重程度mX和倾向pX。这与传统的单变量风险度量(如VaR或Expected short)形成对比,后者通常将两种效应合并在一起。最简单的形式,(mX, PX)是通过在Wasserstein度规中将PX (X)定律传递到两点{0,mX}离散分布,质量为PX (X)。该方法也可以表述为约束最优量化问题。这允许在量级和倾向尺度上对风险进行翔实的比较。几个例子说明了所建议的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Institutional Investors on Real Estate Risk Delta-Gamma Component VaR: Non-Linear Risk Decomposition for any Type of Funds Testing Factor Models in the Cross-Section Quantum Circuit Learning to Compute Option Prices and Their Sensitivities Put Option and Risk Level of Asset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1