More favored - less favored? Women and men in different marital property right systems: A comparative study of marital property rights in the Habsburg Empire during the 18th century

Gertrude Langer-Ostrawsky, Margareth Lanzinger
{"title":"More favored - less favored? Women and men in different marital property right systems: A comparative study of marital property rights in the Habsburg Empire during the 18th century","authors":"Gertrude Langer-Ostrawsky, Margareth Lanzinger","doi":"10.7146/fof.v44i3.132987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our paper focuses on several central points concerning pre-nuptial negotiations, the results of which were finalized in marriage contracts.There are two opposing systems of the law governing marital property regimes: the regime of matrimonial community of property or joint marital property, Gütergemeinschaft, and the regime of separation of marital property, Gütertrennung We compare two territories of the Habsburg Empire – the County of Tirol with the regime of separation of marital property dominating, and the Archduchy of Austria South of the River Enns (Lower Austria), with matrimonial community of property dominating in rural areas. For each territory, we concentrate on a single landed estate: Fridau-Weißenburg in the case of Lower Austria, and Innichen in the case of Tirol. Innichen was a small market town with a mixed economy based on agriculture and the trades; while the estate of Fridau-Weißenburg was more rural and agricultural and also preindustrial since the middle of the 18th century.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.132987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Our paper focuses on several central points concerning pre-nuptial negotiations, the results of which were finalized in marriage contracts.There are two opposing systems of the law governing marital property regimes: the regime of matrimonial community of property or joint marital property, Gütergemeinschaft, and the regime of separation of marital property, Gütertrennung We compare two territories of the Habsburg Empire – the County of Tirol with the regime of separation of marital property dominating, and the Archduchy of Austria South of the River Enns (Lower Austria), with matrimonial community of property dominating in rural areas. For each territory, we concentrate on a single landed estate: Fridau-Weißenburg in the case of Lower Austria, and Innichen in the case of Tirol. Innichen was a small market town with a mixed economy based on agriculture and the trades; while the estate of Fridau-Weißenburg was more rural and agricultural and also preindustrial since the middle of the 18th century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更受青睐还是更不受青睐?不同婚姻财产制度下的男女:18世纪哈布斯堡王朝婚姻财产制度的比较研究
我们的论文集中在几个中心点有关婚前谈判,其结果最终在婚姻合同。有关夫妻财产制度的法律有两种截然相反的制度:我们比较哈布斯堡帝国的两个领土——蒂罗尔郡,其婚姻财产分离制度占主导地位,以及恩斯河以南的奥地利大公国(下奥地利),其农村地区以婚姻财产共同占主导地位。对于每个地区,我们专注于一个单一的地产:下奥地利州的弗里多-魏ßenburg和蒂罗尔州的因尼琴。仁川是一个小型集镇,以农业和贸易为基础的混合经济;而Fridau-Weißenburg的庄园则更偏向于农村和农业,自18世纪中叶以来也是前工业化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ingeniøren og de ægyptiske mumier: En kioskbasker fra 1910’erne En engelsk bogskat i Det Kgl. Bibliotek, Aarhus “Vi har tæmmet Rejselystens ubændige Tiger for en Stund” Skibe på et hav af manuskripter: om Håndskriftsamlingens skibe Kamante og Lulu i Amerika
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1