Representing Authority in Ancient Knowledge Texts

Markus Asper, A. Renger, Tudor Sala, Markus Witte, P. Pilhofer, Sarah Walter, Nalini Kirk
{"title":"Representing Authority in Ancient Knowledge Texts","authors":"Markus Asper, A. Renger, Tudor Sala, Markus Witte, P. Pilhofer, Sarah Walter, Nalini Kirk","doi":"10.17169/FUDOCS_DOCUMENT_000000026007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we would like to discuss some questions concerning authority and knowledge with obvious relevance to our research group Personal and apersonal authorization (B-5). After briefly summarizing how the phenomenon of ‘authority’ is viewed in general, this paper takes up the specific case of authority and tradition. We then consider text as a special case of tradition, and finally knowledge texts as a special case of texts. The most significant section of the paper is the second half, where we sketch out two complementary methods of constructing or representing authority in such texts, one personal and one non-personal. Ancient Greek, religious studies, theology, church history, ancient history and Chinese studies are our areas of expertise, so most of the examples we have chosen come from those fields. But our intention is to draw broad conclusions that could also apply to other traditions as well.","PeriodicalId":206461,"journal":{"name":"eTopoi. Journal for Ancient Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eTopoi. Journal for Ancient Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17169/FUDOCS_DOCUMENT_000000026007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we would like to discuss some questions concerning authority and knowledge with obvious relevance to our research group Personal and apersonal authorization (B-5). After briefly summarizing how the phenomenon of ‘authority’ is viewed in general, this paper takes up the specific case of authority and tradition. We then consider text as a special case of tradition, and finally knowledge texts as a special case of texts. The most significant section of the paper is the second half, where we sketch out two complementary methods of constructing or representing authority in such texts, one personal and one non-personal. Ancient Greek, religious studies, theology, church history, ancient history and Chinese studies are our areas of expertise, so most of the examples we have chosen come from those fields. But our intention is to draw broad conclusions that could also apply to other traditions as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古代知识文本中的权威代表
在本文中,我们想讨论一些与我们的研究小组个人和个人授权(B-5)明显相关的关于权威和知识的问题。在简要概括了人们如何看待“权威”现象之后,本文开始讨论权威与传统的具体案例。然后我们将文本视为传统的特例,最后将知识文本视为文本的特例。本文最重要的部分是第二部分,在那里我们勾勒出两种互补的方法来构建或代表这些文本中的权威,一种是个人的,一种是非个人的。古希腊、宗教研究、神学、教会历史、古代历史和中国研究是我们的专业领域,所以我们选择的大多数例子都来自这些领域。但我们的目的是得出广泛的结论,这些结论也适用于其他传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Hinterland of Nikaia/Nicaea/Iznik. Analyzing the Hellenistic, Roman, and Late Antique Bithynian Landscape through Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques Utility and Benefits of Water in Andalusi Law. Criteria for its Proportional, Balanced Allocation and Distribution (8th and 9th Centuries) Mathematical modeling of the spreading of innovations in the ancient world Transforming Technical Know-how in Time and Space. Using the Digital Atlas of Innovations to Understand the Innovation Process of Animal Traction and the Wheel Quantifying Chronological Inconsistencies of Archaeological Sites in the Petra Area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1