US Pressure and Changing Dynamics of India’s Patent Policy

Roshan John
{"title":"US Pressure and Changing Dynamics of India’s Patent Policy","authors":"Roshan John","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3450523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Office of the United States Trade Representative released its annual Special 301 Report this April and India continues to be on the Priority Watch List for a record 27th time. The USTR through its annual report identifies those countries, which it considers to be having inadequate intellectual property (IP) protection for US industries, including pharmaceutical industries. The Report, every year as a custom, demands stringent IP standards and enforcement in third world countries to undermine the competitors of these US behemoths. \n \nThe Special 301 Report, driven majorly by demands from lobbyists for multinational pharmaceutical corporations, is the most effective mechanism that the US government employs to pressure countries like India to amend their laws and policies to favour US industries at the cost of not only the local industry but also right to health of people. The US initiate retaliatory action(s) against such countries via trade sanctions in the form of prohibitory tariffs, which causes countries on the list to be wary of the annual report. Further, it provides for a range of country listings, remedies and possible investigations to strong-arm other countries to surrender to US demands.","PeriodicalId":137980,"journal":{"name":"Public Health eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3450523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Office of the United States Trade Representative released its annual Special 301 Report this April and India continues to be on the Priority Watch List for a record 27th time. The USTR through its annual report identifies those countries, which it considers to be having inadequate intellectual property (IP) protection for US industries, including pharmaceutical industries. The Report, every year as a custom, demands stringent IP standards and enforcement in third world countries to undermine the competitors of these US behemoths. The Special 301 Report, driven majorly by demands from lobbyists for multinational pharmaceutical corporations, is the most effective mechanism that the US government employs to pressure countries like India to amend their laws and policies to favour US industries at the cost of not only the local industry but also right to health of people. The US initiate retaliatory action(s) against such countries via trade sanctions in the form of prohibitory tariffs, which causes countries on the list to be wary of the annual report. Further, it provides for a range of country listings, remedies and possible investigations to strong-arm other countries to surrender to US demands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的压力和印度专利政策的变化动态
今年4月,美国贸易代表办公室(Office of The United States Trade Representative)发布了年度《特别301报告》(Special 301 Report),印度创纪录地第27次被列入“重点观察名单”。美国贸易代表办公室通过其年度报告确定了那些它认为对美国工业(包括制药业)知识产权保护不足的国家。该报告每年都要求第三世界国家实施严格的知识产权标准和执法,以削弱这些美国巨头的竞争对手。特别301报告主要是由跨国制药公司说客的要求推动的,是美国政府用来向印度等国家施加压力的最有效的机制,迫使它们修改法律和政策,以有利于美国工业,不仅以当地工业为代价,而且以人民的健康权为代价。美国以禁止性关税的形式对这些国家采取贸易制裁的报复行动,这使得名单上的国家对年度报告保持警惕。此外,它还规定了一系列国家名单、补救措施和可能的调查,以迫使其他国家屈服于美国的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current trends in the visual transformation of periodic publications in the field of medicine and social care The Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown on Bodyweight Status and Lifestyle Behaviors Among US Adults: Evidence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2018-2020 An Analysis of Nepal’s Clinical Pediatric Services and Policies to Address Child Mortality The Effect of 'Failed' Community Mental Health Centers on Non-White Mortality This Great Catastrophe: Bungling Pandemics from 1918 to Today
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1