A. Wibawa, Nastiti Susetyo Fanany Putri, Prasetya Widiharso
{"title":"Letter Detection : An Empirical Comparative Study of Different ML Classifier and Feature Extraction","authors":"A. Wibawa, Nastiti Susetyo Fanany Putri, Prasetya Widiharso","doi":"10.31763/simple.v5i1.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work and communication activities are inextricably linked. Letters are an example of a communication medium that is still widely utilized. When it comes to significant job, however, simply an official letter is required. Official and private letters must be distinguished and classified. Different feature extraction methods, such as the count-vectorizer and TF-IDF vectorizer, are employed to transmit the detection of this official and personal letter. To categorize letters by type, various machine learning (ML) techniques are employed. Nave Bayes, Support vector machine, and AdaBoost are the algorithms. The accuracy measurements used in this study include accuracy scores, F1-mean, recall, and precision. The best working algorithm is Naïve Bayes for two vectorizer methods used, with an accuracy value of 98%.","PeriodicalId":115994,"journal":{"name":"Signal and Image Processing Letters","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signal and Image Processing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31763/simple.v5i1.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Work and communication activities are inextricably linked. Letters are an example of a communication medium that is still widely utilized. When it comes to significant job, however, simply an official letter is required. Official and private letters must be distinguished and classified. Different feature extraction methods, such as the count-vectorizer and TF-IDF vectorizer, are employed to transmit the detection of this official and personal letter. To categorize letters by type, various machine learning (ML) techniques are employed. Nave Bayes, Support vector machine, and AdaBoost are the algorithms. The accuracy measurements used in this study include accuracy scores, F1-mean, recall, and precision. The best working algorithm is Naïve Bayes for two vectorizer methods used, with an accuracy value of 98%.
工作和交流活动是密不可分的。信件是一种仍然被广泛使用的交流媒介。然而,当涉及到重要的工作时,只需要一封正式的信件。公务信件和私人信件必须加以区分和分类。采用不同的特征提取方法,如计数矢量器和TF-IDF矢量器,传输该公函和私人信件的检测。为了按类型对字母进行分类,使用了各种机器学习(ML)技术。Nave Bayes, Support vector machine和AdaBoost是算法。本研究中使用的准确度测量包括准确度分数、f1均值、召回率和精度。工作效果最好的算法是Naïve贝叶斯对于两种矢量化方法所使用的,准确率值为98%。