A quantitative method for the assessment of VSC-HVdc controller simulations in EMT tools

IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Europe Pub Date : 2014-10-01 DOI:10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2014.7028824

Robert Rogersten, L. Vanfretti, Wei Li, Lidong Zhang, P. Mitra

{"title":"A quantitative method for the assessment of VSC-HVdc controller simulations in EMT tools","authors":"Robert Rogersten, L. Vanfretti, Wei Li, Lidong Zhang, P. Mitra","doi":"10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2014.7028824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voltage-Source Converter-Based High-voltage dc (VSC-HVdc) technology has received growing interest during recent years due to its benefits for separated active and reactive power control. Before the installation of VSC-HVdc links, different simulation-based studies need to be performed, usually by different parties and using different electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation platforms. This paper provides a systematic method to assess discrepancies between simulation tools. Models of the VSC and its control systems are implemented from scratch in two different tools. A metric and a methodology to quantitatively assess the discrepancies between simulation results is proposed and illustrated. The paper shows that even with a pedantic re-implementation of the models from the ground up, simulation results are still inconsistent. The objective of this paper is to develop a quantification method for comparing the models developed in different EMT simulation tool and to emphasize differences that can arise with the numerical solvers in such tools.","PeriodicalId":299515,"journal":{"name":"IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Europe","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2014.7028824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Abstract

Voltage-Source Converter-Based High-voltage dc (VSC-HVdc) technology has received growing interest during recent years due to its benefits for separated active and reactive power control. Before the installation of VSC-HVdc links, different simulation-based studies need to be performed, usually by different parties and using different electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation platforms. This paper provides a systematic method to assess discrepancies between simulation tools. Models of the VSC and its control systems are implemented from scratch in two different tools. A metric and a methodology to quantitatively assess the discrepancies between simulation results is proposed and illustrated. The paper shows that even with a pedantic re-implementation of the models from the ground up, simulation results are still inconsistent. The objective of this paper is to develop a quantification method for comparing the models developed in different EMT simulation tool and to emphasize differences that can arise with the numerical solvers in such tools.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

EMT工具中VSC-HVdc控制器仿真的定量评估方法

基于电压源变换器的高压直流(vcs - hvdc)技术由于其分离有功和无功控制的优点，近年来受到越来越多的关注。在安装vcs - hvdc链路之前，需要进行不同的基于仿真的研究，通常由不同的方使用不同的电磁瞬变(EMT)仿真平台。本文提供了一种系统的方法来评估模拟工具之间的差异。VSC及其控制系统的模型在两种不同的工具中从零开始实现。提出并说明了定量评估模拟结果之间差异的度量和方法。本文表明，即使对模型进行了彻底的重新实现，仿真结果仍然不一致。本文的目的是开发一种量化方法来比较不同EMT模拟工具中开发的模型，并强调这些工具中数值解算器可能出现的差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Europe

自引率

0.00%

发文量