College instructor education: A model for effective student learning.

Sharmaine Itwaru, Donald E. Scott
{"title":"College instructor education: A model for effective student learning.","authors":"Sharmaine Itwaru, Donald E. Scott","doi":"10.29173/ijll20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interconnection between teaching and learning in higher education has been the subject of academic investigation for some time. However, within the community college context, the effectiveness of pedagogically trained instructors on student learning has remained an under-examined area of scholarly research. This study advances a greater understanding regarding the importance of quality teaching within the community college system in Ontario and explores how institutional policy and practices support or impede the promotion of quality teaching. \nA mixed methods sequential explanatory design was employed at a Toronto college to gauge the perspectives of participants in three sub-groups of the College strata: administrators, instructors, and students. A pragmatic approach was utilised from which multiple methods of data collection (i.e., semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and online questionnaires) were selected to exhaustively address the primary research question. \nKey findings revealed that formal academic development in pedagogical education was perceived by the majority of participants as foundational to effective teaching practice and that more comprehensive academic development was needed to improve both current practice and student academic achievement. Most instructors and students concurred that learner-centred approaches, both in class and in field placements, led to a deeper level of learning. From a leadership standpoint, participants also believed that college policies and practices were misaligned with promoting quality instruction and that greater progress towards alignment was necessary; thus, there were serious leadership implications. This study adds to the current instructor education discourse by providing impetus for institutional change towards the professionalisation of college instructors and also recognises the inextricable tie between instructor education and student learning.","PeriodicalId":120758,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Leadership in Learning","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Leadership in Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/ijll20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interconnection between teaching and learning in higher education has been the subject of academic investigation for some time. However, within the community college context, the effectiveness of pedagogically trained instructors on student learning has remained an under-examined area of scholarly research. This study advances a greater understanding regarding the importance of quality teaching within the community college system in Ontario and explores how institutional policy and practices support or impede the promotion of quality teaching. A mixed methods sequential explanatory design was employed at a Toronto college to gauge the perspectives of participants in three sub-groups of the College strata: administrators, instructors, and students. A pragmatic approach was utilised from which multiple methods of data collection (i.e., semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and online questionnaires) were selected to exhaustively address the primary research question. Key findings revealed that formal academic development in pedagogical education was perceived by the majority of participants as foundational to effective teaching practice and that more comprehensive academic development was needed to improve both current practice and student academic achievement. Most instructors and students concurred that learner-centred approaches, both in class and in field placements, led to a deeper level of learning. From a leadership standpoint, participants also believed that college policies and practices were misaligned with promoting quality instruction and that greater progress towards alignment was necessary; thus, there were serious leadership implications. This study adds to the current instructor education discourse by providing impetus for institutional change towards the professionalisation of college instructors and also recognises the inextricable tie between instructor education and student learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学教师教育:学生有效学习的典范。
高等教育中教与学的相互联系一直是学术界研究的主题。然而,在社区大学的背景下,受过教学训练的教师对学生学习的有效性仍然是一个学术研究的不足之处。本研究促进了对安大略省社区学院系统中质量教学重要性的更深入理解,并探讨了机构政策和实践如何支持或阻碍质量教学的促进。在多伦多一所大学采用混合方法序贯解释设计来衡量学院阶层中三个子群体参与者的观点:管理人员、教师和学生。采用务实的方法,从中选择多种数据收集方法(即半结构化访谈、焦点小组和在线问卷),以详尽地解决主要研究问题。主要研究结果显示,大多数参与者认为正规的学术发展是有效教学实践的基础,需要更全面的学术发展来提高当前的实践和学生的学术成就。大多数教师和学生一致认为,无论是在课堂上还是在实地实习中,以学习者为中心的方法都能带来更深层次的学习。从领导的角度来看,与会者也认为大学的政策和做法与促进教学质量不一致,需要更大的进步;因此,有严重的领导影响。本研究通过推动大学教师专业化的制度变革,增加了当前教师教育的论述,也认识到教师教育与学生学习之间不可分割的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bridging the divide: Exploring inequities between sworn and civilian leaders in a Canadian police service. Breaking down silos: Postsecondary leaders collaborating to advance One Health in education. Experiencing leadership: Perceptions of leadership development for higher education contexts. Imagination as a catalyst for Relational Leadership: Educational leaders’ perspectives. An exploration of generativity in faculty group processes in post-secondary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1