Joseon’s Politics in the Midst of Power Rivalry between Meiji Japan and Qing Empire: Focusing on the Perception of War and Politics in Yun Chi-ho Diary

Young-june Park
{"title":"Joseon’s Politics in the Midst of Power Rivalry between Meiji Japan and Qing Empire: Focusing on the Perception of War and Politics in Yun Chi-ho Diary","authors":"Young-june Park","doi":"10.33127/kdps.2023.44.2.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper tries to shed light on the first Sino-Japanese war(1894-1895) from the perspective of hegemonic war. Generally, hegemonic war theories emphasizes differential growth of national power among great powers as one cause of major war. However, some theorists pointed out that foreign policies of middle powers in the midst of great power rivalry can ignite direct confrontation between two powers. Based on this observation, this paper explains what policy did Joseon dynasty take during the power rivalry between Qing Empire and Meiji Japan in the late 19th century. In the face of growing rivalry between Meiji Japan and Qing Empire, politicians in Joseon dynasty began to be divided into pro-Japan faction and pro-Qing faction each other; eventually two factions harshly confronted through Imo military rebellion(壬午軍亂) and Kapsin political upheaval(甲申政變). These internal political clash invited neighboring powers intervention into Joseon’s politics and ignited two powers’ direct confrontation over Korean peninsula’s dominance. Joseon’s younger intellectual Yun Chi- ho’s diary illustrated well how did Joseon’s junior politicians lose the vision of their dynasty’s future and expected advanced foreign countries’ intervention into Joseon’s internal politics.","PeriodicalId":281089,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association for Political and Diplomatic History","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association for Political and Diplomatic History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33127/kdps.2023.44.2.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper tries to shed light on the first Sino-Japanese war(1894-1895) from the perspective of hegemonic war. Generally, hegemonic war theories emphasizes differential growth of national power among great powers as one cause of major war. However, some theorists pointed out that foreign policies of middle powers in the midst of great power rivalry can ignite direct confrontation between two powers. Based on this observation, this paper explains what policy did Joseon dynasty take during the power rivalry between Qing Empire and Meiji Japan in the late 19th century. In the face of growing rivalry between Meiji Japan and Qing Empire, politicians in Joseon dynasty began to be divided into pro-Japan faction and pro-Qing faction each other; eventually two factions harshly confronted through Imo military rebellion(壬午軍亂) and Kapsin political upheaval(甲申政變). These internal political clash invited neighboring powers intervention into Joseon’s politics and ignited two powers’ direct confrontation over Korean peninsula’s dominance. Joseon’s younger intellectual Yun Chi- ho’s diary illustrated well how did Joseon’s junior politicians lose the vision of their dynasty’s future and expected advanced foreign countries’ intervention into Joseon’s internal politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
明治日本与清帝国权力竞争中的朝鲜政治——以《尹志浩日记》中的战争与政治观为中心
本文试图从霸权战争的视角来解读甲午战争。一般来说,霸权战争理论强调大国之间国家实力的差异增长是主要战争的原因之一。但是,一些理论家指出,在大国竞争中,中等大国的外交政策有可能引发两国之间的直接对抗。在此基础上,本文分析了19世纪末清帝国与明治日本的权力竞争中,朝鲜采取了怎样的政策。面对明治日本与清帝国之间日益激烈的竞争,朝鲜政界开始分化为亲日派和亲清派;最终,两个派系通过伊摩的军事叛乱(壬)和Kapsin的政治动荡(壬)进行了激烈的对抗。这些内部政治冲突促使周边国家介入朝鲜政治,引发了两国围绕韩半岛主导权的直接对抗。朝鲜年轻的知识分子尹志浩的日记很好地说明了朝鲜的年轻政治家是如何失去对王朝未来的远见,并期望先进的外国干涉朝鲜的内部政治的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Maritime Defence Plan and Joseon in the 19th century Qing dynasty: Focusing on the Qing Dynasty’s Vassal Policy & “the Gateway Perception” Pathway for ROK-US Alliance : Global Comprehensive Strategic Alliance and Conventional-Nuclear Integration(CNI) Shimane Prefecture’s perception of the waters around Dokdo Island surrounding the Peace Line: Politicization of fishing rights A Study of a Solution to Diplomatic Problems in Northeast Asia Using Seo Hee’s Diplomatic Strategy Presidential Elections in Post-Democratic Korea: History and the Principles of Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1