Film and the Aesthetics of German Fascism

D. Mourenza
{"title":"Film and the Aesthetics of German Fascism","authors":"D. Mourenza","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvwh8f7d.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyses Benjamin’s writings on German film. Through an analysis of ‘Theories of German Fascism’ (1930), it assesses to what extent the failed reception of technology in Germany had an impact on cinema. Drawing from Benjamin’s remarks on the masses, the chapter analyses the film Metropolis (dir. Fritz Lang, 1927) as an example of the ‘architectonic quality’ that Benjamin detected in UFA productions during the Weimar Republic. The films by Leni Riefenstahl are analysed as an illustration of the corrupted representation of the masses performed by National Socialism. Finally, the chapter interprets the aestheticization of politics promoted by fascism from the point of view of Benjamin’s reconfiguration of aesthetics and the relationship between the historically constructed human nature and technology.","PeriodicalId":248788,"journal":{"name":"Walter Benjamin and the Aesthetics of Film","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Walter Benjamin and the Aesthetics of Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvwh8f7d.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter analyses Benjamin’s writings on German film. Through an analysis of ‘Theories of German Fascism’ (1930), it assesses to what extent the failed reception of technology in Germany had an impact on cinema. Drawing from Benjamin’s remarks on the masses, the chapter analyses the film Metropolis (dir. Fritz Lang, 1927) as an example of the ‘architectonic quality’ that Benjamin detected in UFA productions during the Weimar Republic. The films by Leni Riefenstahl are analysed as an illustration of the corrupted representation of the masses performed by National Socialism. Finally, the chapter interprets the aestheticization of politics promoted by fascism from the point of view of Benjamin’s reconfiguration of aesthetics and the relationship between the historically constructed human nature and technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本章分析本雅明关于德国电影的著述。通过对“德国法西斯主义理论”(1930)的分析,它评估了德国对技术的失败接受在多大程度上影响了电影。本章以本雅明对大众的评论为基础,分析了电影《大都会》(导演:r.m。Fritz Lang, 1927)作为本杰明在魏玛共和国期间在UFA产品中发现的“建筑品质”的一个例子。莱尼·里芬斯塔尔(Leni Riefenstahl)的电影被分析为国家社会主义对群众的腐败表现的例证。最后,本章从本雅明对美学的重构以及历史建构的人性与技术的关系的角度,阐释法西斯主义推动的政治审美化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Index 3. Film and the Aesthetics of German Fascism 5. Mickey Mouse: Utopian and Barbarian 1. Anthropological Materialism and the Aesthetics of Film
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1