Archaeological sites in Nepal and India: Concerns of lightning risks

Shriyog Sharma, Shriram Sharma, Chandima Gomes
{"title":"Archaeological sites in Nepal and India: Concerns of lightning risks","authors":"Shriyog Sharma, Shriram Sharma, Chandima Gomes","doi":"10.1109/ICLP56858.2022.9942511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the present-day lightning risks of a large number of archaeological sites in Asia, with special attention to religious monuments in South Asia with invaluable historical value. The study reveals that in most cases, no lightning protection measures (LPM) have been adopted and in several structures, LPM have been adopted but without conducting a methodical risk assessment or standard system design under experts' advice. In a majority of archaeological buildings in Nepal, appropriate lightning protection systems have not been installed, though an apparent air termination system could be observed in the form of a metallic spire or a metallic roof component. However, a system of down conductors and earth terminations has not been properly installed or not installed at all. Both the Department of archaeology and the Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC) have not taken adequate steps to install LPS in archaeological sites fearing losing the aesthetic appearance and historical values of the structures. Appropriate LPM has not been adopted even on the structures that have been rebuilt after they were partly or fully damaged by the 2015 earthquake. In many historical structures in the southern part of India, on the other hand, partial LPM has been adopted. Even those that are designed up to the knowledge and standards that existed at the time of design, have not been maintained, and as a result, the components are most often loosely hanging or partially destroyed. Many authorities argue that concerned monuments have survived for several centuries or even over a millennium thus they do not need lightning protection. However, the environment of many such monuments is now modified with rain shelters, lighting systems, CCTVs etc., without having any LPM, thus their exposure level has been increased. However, there are no attempts made in estimating the new risk with modifications that have been done. Also, in the South Indian region, several highly significant monuments and structures have been observed to have Early Streamer Emission (ESE) devices with single down conductors. Most often, these down conductors have multiple acute bends due to the architectural topography of the building. In many such cases, the earthing system is obscured and impossible to be inspected. On such a backdrop, we propose new compulsory international or national standards or an annexure to existing standards for risk assessment, design, implementation and maintenance of LPS of archaeological structures.","PeriodicalId":403323,"journal":{"name":"2022 36th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 36th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP56858.2022.9942511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the present-day lightning risks of a large number of archaeological sites in Asia, with special attention to religious monuments in South Asia with invaluable historical value. The study reveals that in most cases, no lightning protection measures (LPM) have been adopted and in several structures, LPM have been adopted but without conducting a methodical risk assessment or standard system design under experts' advice. In a majority of archaeological buildings in Nepal, appropriate lightning protection systems have not been installed, though an apparent air termination system could be observed in the form of a metallic spire or a metallic roof component. However, a system of down conductors and earth terminations has not been properly installed or not installed at all. Both the Department of archaeology and the Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC) have not taken adequate steps to install LPS in archaeological sites fearing losing the aesthetic appearance and historical values of the structures. Appropriate LPM has not been adopted even on the structures that have been rebuilt after they were partly or fully damaged by the 2015 earthquake. In many historical structures in the southern part of India, on the other hand, partial LPM has been adopted. Even those that are designed up to the knowledge and standards that existed at the time of design, have not been maintained, and as a result, the components are most often loosely hanging or partially destroyed. Many authorities argue that concerned monuments have survived for several centuries or even over a millennium thus they do not need lightning protection. However, the environment of many such monuments is now modified with rain shelters, lighting systems, CCTVs etc., without having any LPM, thus their exposure level has been increased. However, there are no attempts made in estimating the new risk with modifications that have been done. Also, in the South Indian region, several highly significant monuments and structures have been observed to have Early Streamer Emission (ESE) devices with single down conductors. Most often, these down conductors have multiple acute bends due to the architectural topography of the building. In many such cases, the earthing system is obscured and impossible to be inspected. On such a backdrop, we propose new compulsory international or national standards or an annexure to existing standards for risk assessment, design, implementation and maintenance of LPS of archaeological structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔和印度的考古遗址:对闪电风险的担忧
本研究调查了当今亚洲大量考古遗址的闪电风险,特别关注南亚具有宝贵历史价值的宗教古迹。研究显示,在大多数情况下,没有采取防雷措施,而在一些建筑物中,采取了防雷措施,但没有在专家的建议下进行系统的风险评估或标准的系统设计。在尼泊尔的大多数考古建筑中,没有安装适当的防雷系统,尽管可以观察到金属尖顶或金属屋顶组件形式的明显的空气终止系统。但是,下导线和接地端子的系统没有正确安装或根本没有安装。考古部门和城市发展和建筑建设部(DUDBC)都没有采取足够的措施在考古遗址安装LPS,担心失去建筑的美学外观和历史价值。即使是在2015年地震中部分或全部受损后重建的结构,也没有采用适当的LPM。另一方面,在印度南部的许多历史建筑中,采用了部分LPM。即使是那些按照设计时存在的知识和标准设计的组件,也没有得到维护,因此,组件通常是松散的悬挂或部分损坏。许多权威人士认为,有关的古迹已经存在了几个世纪,甚至超过一千年,因此他们不需要防雷。然而,现在许多这样的古迹的环境被改变了,有遮雨棚、照明系统、闭路电视等,没有任何LPM,因此它们的暴露水平增加了。然而,没有尝试对已经完成的修改进行新的风险评估。此外,在南印度地区,已经观察到几个非常重要的纪念碑和结构具有单down导体的早期流光发射(ESE)设备。大多数情况下,由于建筑物的建筑地形,这些向下的导体有多个急转弯。在许多这样的情况下,接地系统是模糊的,不可能被检查。在此背景下,我们建议新的强制性国际或国家标准或现有标准的附录,用于考古结构的LPS风险评估、设计、实施和维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thunderstorm types and meteorological characteristics of upward lightning Study of Power Equipment Trouble Caused by Lightning in Traction Substation An investigation of lightning impulse on earthing materials and fulgurites formation A Qualitative Research Approach to Study the Healing Powers of Plant Species against Lightning Used by South African Indigenous Communities of KwaZulu Natal Province, South Africa Influence of Grounding Wires on Measured Frequency-Dependent Soil Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1