From Lewisian Chance to Humean Chance

C. Hoefer
{"title":"From Lewisian Chance to Humean Chance","authors":"C. Hoefer","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190907419.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces David Lewis’ highly influential views on objective chance, from his 1980 treatment of objective chance and the Principal Principle (PP) to his 1994 Humean Best System analysis of chance. Some unfortunate consequences of Lewis’ theory are discussed: (1) if the Best System of laws for the world has no probabilistic laws in it, then there are no objective chances in the world. (2) Physical determinism is incompatible with non-trivial objective chances. (3) Events in the past are “no longer chancy.” It is argued that a good account of chance can and should reject all three of these consequences. But two pillars of Lewis’ approach remain valid. First, his contention that the ability to demonstrably play the chance role captured by the PP is crucial for any account of the nature of objective chance. And second, his intuition that a Best System approach in which chance facts supervene on patterns in the Humean Mosaic is a promising approach vis-à-vis allowing such a demonstrable grounding of the PP.","PeriodicalId":231073,"journal":{"name":"Chance in the World","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chance in the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190907419.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter introduces David Lewis’ highly influential views on objective chance, from his 1980 treatment of objective chance and the Principal Principle (PP) to his 1994 Humean Best System analysis of chance. Some unfortunate consequences of Lewis’ theory are discussed: (1) if the Best System of laws for the world has no probabilistic laws in it, then there are no objective chances in the world. (2) Physical determinism is incompatible with non-trivial objective chances. (3) Events in the past are “no longer chancy.” It is argued that a good account of chance can and should reject all three of these consequences. But two pillars of Lewis’ approach remain valid. First, his contention that the ability to demonstrably play the chance role captured by the PP is crucial for any account of the nature of objective chance. And second, his intuition that a Best System approach in which chance facts supervene on patterns in the Humean Mosaic is a promising approach vis-à-vis allowing such a demonstrable grounding of the PP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从刘易斯的机会到休谟的机会
本章介绍了大卫·刘易斯关于客观机会的极具影响力的观点,从他1980年对客观机会和基本原理(PP)的处理到1994年对机会的休谟最佳系统分析。本文讨论了刘易斯理论的一些不幸后果:(1)如果世界上最好的法律体系中没有概率律,那么世界上就没有客观的机会。(2)物理决定论与非平凡的客观机会是不相容的。(3)过去发生的事情“不再是偶然的”。有人认为,对机会的良好描述能够而且应该拒绝所有这三种结果。但刘易斯方法的两个支柱仍然有效。首先,他的论点是,对于客观机会的本质的任何解释来说,证明人民党所捕获的机会作用的能力是至关重要的。其次,他的直觉是,一个最佳系统方法,其中偶然事实监督休谟马赛克的模式是一个有前途的方法,可见-à-vis允许这样一个可论证的PP基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deducing the Principal Principle Chance and Causation Humean Objective Chance Humean Chance in Physics From Lewisian Chance to Humean Chance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1