Classifying ischemic events using a Bayesian inference Multilayer Perceptron and input variable evaluation using automatic relevance determination

M.G. Smyrnakis, D.J. Evans
{"title":"Classifying ischemic events using a Bayesian inference Multilayer Perceptron and input variable evaluation using automatic relevance determination","authors":"M.G. Smyrnakis, D.J. Evans","doi":"10.1109/CIC.2007.4745482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present a Bayesian inference Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) which was used to classify the events of the Long Term ST Database (LTSTDB) as ischaemic or non-ischaemic episodes with an accuracy of 89.1%, sensitivity of 82.3% and specificity of 91.2% when the accuracy of the winning paper was 90.7%. The Automatic Relevance Determination (ARD) method was used to identify which of the extracted features that were used as input in the Bayesian inference MLP were the most important with respect to the models performance. ARD indicated that DeltaT, a combination of the ST deviation and the duration of the episode, inspired from Langley et al., was the most important feature for determining Ischaemic episodes, given the data. A simple MLP which had as input variable of only DeltaT was trained to verify the results of the ARD method. The classification accuracy was 85.8% on the test set. We can conclude from the results that the most important extracted feature was DeltaT.","PeriodicalId":406683,"journal":{"name":"2007 Computers in Cardiology","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Computers in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2007.4745482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In this paper we present a Bayesian inference Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) which was used to classify the events of the Long Term ST Database (LTSTDB) as ischaemic or non-ischaemic episodes with an accuracy of 89.1%, sensitivity of 82.3% and specificity of 91.2% when the accuracy of the winning paper was 90.7%. The Automatic Relevance Determination (ARD) method was used to identify which of the extracted features that were used as input in the Bayesian inference MLP were the most important with respect to the models performance. ARD indicated that DeltaT, a combination of the ST deviation and the duration of the episode, inspired from Langley et al., was the most important feature for determining Ischaemic episodes, given the data. A simple MLP which had as input variable of only DeltaT was trained to verify the results of the ARD method. The classification accuracy was 85.8% on the test set. We can conclude from the results that the most important extracted feature was DeltaT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用贝叶斯推理多层感知器对缺血事件进行分类,并使用自动相关性确定输入变量评估
在本文中,我们提出了一个贝叶斯推理多层感知器(MLP),用于将长期ST数据库(LTSTDB)的事件分类为缺血或非缺血发作,准确度为89.1%,灵敏度为82.3%,特异性为91.2%,而获奖论文的准确性为90.7%。使用自动关联确定(ARD)方法来识别提取的特征中哪些作为贝叶斯推理MLP的输入对模型性能最重要。ARD指出,从Langley等人那里得到启发,DeltaT是ST差和发作持续时间的结合,是确定缺血发作的最重要特征。为了验证ARD方法的结果,我们训练了一个输入变量仅为delta的简单MLP。在测试集上的分类准确率为85.8%。从结果可以看出,提取的最重要的特征是delta。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation and use of a patient data management system in the intensive care unit: A two-year experience Modelling effects of sotalol on T-wave morphology Vulnerability to reentry in a 3D regionally ischemic ventricular slab preparation: A simulation study Evaluation of multi-component Electrocardiogram beat detection algorithms: Implications of three different noise artifacts Dynamic 4D blood flow representation in the aorta and analysis from cine-MRI in patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1