Debt Restructuring in English Law: Lessons from the US and the Need for Reform

J. Payne
{"title":"Debt Restructuring in English Law: Lessons from the US and the Need for Reform","authors":"J. Payne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2321615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper assesses the debt restructuring mechanisms available to companies in English law, compares these mechanisms with the Chapter 11 procedure in the US, and makes some suggestions for reform of the English system in this context. Rehabilitating a company in financial difficulties will almost always be preferable to liquidation for companies and their creditors, at least where the company is merely financially distressed, i.e. it is cash flow insolvent but nevertheless economically viable, so that there is a business worth saving. Five debt restructuring mechanisms are available to companies in English law: workouts, Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs), schemes of arrangement, administration and, lastly, a recent innovation of practitioners has been to twin a scheme of arrangement with administration. None of these devices are ideal as debt restructuring tools, as explained in this paper. Lessons can be learned from the US Chapter 11 process, although a simple transplantation of this procedure into English law is not recommended, as there are also disadvantages to the US procedure. Instead it is suggested that the English scheme of arrangement be reformed to allow a cramdown of whole classes to take place, to attach a moratorium to this procedure and to enhance the valuation process where restructuring takes place. Making these changes would provide English law with a stronger and more effective debt restructuring procedure.","PeriodicalId":174628,"journal":{"name":"English Law: Business (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Law: Business (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2321615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper assesses the debt restructuring mechanisms available to companies in English law, compares these mechanisms with the Chapter 11 procedure in the US, and makes some suggestions for reform of the English system in this context. Rehabilitating a company in financial difficulties will almost always be preferable to liquidation for companies and their creditors, at least where the company is merely financially distressed, i.e. it is cash flow insolvent but nevertheless economically viable, so that there is a business worth saving. Five debt restructuring mechanisms are available to companies in English law: workouts, Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs), schemes of arrangement, administration and, lastly, a recent innovation of practitioners has been to twin a scheme of arrangement with administration. None of these devices are ideal as debt restructuring tools, as explained in this paper. Lessons can be learned from the US Chapter 11 process, although a simple transplantation of this procedure into English law is not recommended, as there are also disadvantages to the US procedure. Instead it is suggested that the English scheme of arrangement be reformed to allow a cramdown of whole classes to take place, to attach a moratorium to this procedure and to enhance the valuation process where restructuring takes place. Making these changes would provide English law with a stronger and more effective debt restructuring procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国法律中的债务重组:美国的经验教训和改革的必要性
本文评估了英国法律中适用于公司的债务重组机制,并将这些机制与美国破产法第11章程序进行了比较,并在此背景下对英国的债务重组制度改革提出了一些建议。对公司及其债权人来说,让一家陷入财务困境的公司复盘几乎总是比清算更可取的,至少在公司仅仅处于财务困境的情况下是这样,即现金流资不抵债,但在经济上仍然可行,因此有一家值得拯救的企业。在英国法律中,公司有五种债务重组机制:破产重组、公司自愿安排(cva)、安排方案、行政管理,最后,从业者最近的一项创新是将安排方案与行政管理结合起来。正如本文所解释的那样,这些手段都不是理想的债务重组工具。可以从美国的第11章程序中吸取教训,尽管不建议将该程序简单地移植到英国法律中,因为美国程序也有缺点。相反,有人建议改革英国的安排方案,允许整个班级的强制上课,暂停这一程序,并加强进行重组的评估程序。做出这些改变将为英国法律提供一个更有力、更有效的债务重组程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19: Assessing Some Potential Global Economic, Business and Legal Impacts The Pursuit to Defeat Underwriter Opportunism: A Comparative Analysis of Combating Misconduct in the Claims Process The Impact of Case Law on the Duty of Trust and Confidence in the English Legal System Parent Company Direct Liability for Overseas Human Rights Violations: Lessons from the UK Supreme Court Applying Economics to the Internet: Can Regulators and Competition Authorities Keep Pace?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1