Understanding Frac Fluid Distribution of an Individual Frac Stage from Chemical Tracer Flowback Data

Wei Tian, A. Darnley, Teddy Mohle, K. Johns, D. Christopher
{"title":"Understanding Frac Fluid Distribution of an Individual Frac Stage from Chemical Tracer Flowback Data","authors":"Wei Tian, A. Darnley, Teddy Mohle, K. Johns, D. Christopher","doi":"10.2118/194362-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A data set is presented which involves pumping multiple, unique chemical tracers into a single ‘Wolfcamp B’ fracture stage. The goal of this tracer test is to shed light on the flowback characteristics of individually tagged fluid & sand segments by adding another layer of granularity to a typical tracer flowback report. The added intra-stage level detail can provide insights into fracture behavior when stimulating shale reservoirs by looking at individual fluid segment tracer recoveries. This data set could aid in the interpretation of:\n Identifying fluid segments placed outside of the P-SRV (Propped Stimulated Reservoir Volume) Fracture Complexity\n A total of 12 water phase tracers and 12 oil phase tracers were injected sequentially from \"Pad\" to \"Flush\". After pumping the pad stage, unique tracers were used to tag the \"Proppant Laden Fluid\" from the 0.2 ppa 100 mesh sand stage to the 2 ppa 40/70 mesh sand stage, before going to flush. The flush volume was not traced. Upon flowback, produced fluids were analyzed for the concentration of each tracer within the produced fluid samples. The first goal was to determine whether any traced fluid would be placed within \"unpropped\" SRV. The second goal was to determine the order of load fluid returns, to verify the \"first-in, last-out\" phenomenon, and to ascertain any degree of fluid mixing, which could be an indication of increased fracture complexity.\n The results illustrate the average tracer concentration and arrival time of each traced fluid segment, which was then used to characterize the fracture stage. All tracers were detected in the produced fluid samples, indicating that no traced segment was placed outside of the propped fracture network. The results also indicate that significant tracer mixing occured within the fracture network, a potential indicator of fracture complexity. All individually traced segments flowed back simultaneously, albeit at varying tracer concentrations. The residence time calculation for each tracer showed that frac fluid injected into the later proppant segments generally flowed back faster than the earlier segments. No obvious piston-like displacement of frac fluid was observed from the tracer data.","PeriodicalId":103693,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, February 06, 2019","volume":"os-12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, February 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194362-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A data set is presented which involves pumping multiple, unique chemical tracers into a single ‘Wolfcamp B’ fracture stage. The goal of this tracer test is to shed light on the flowback characteristics of individually tagged fluid & sand segments by adding another layer of granularity to a typical tracer flowback report. The added intra-stage level detail can provide insights into fracture behavior when stimulating shale reservoirs by looking at individual fluid segment tracer recoveries. This data set could aid in the interpretation of: Identifying fluid segments placed outside of the P-SRV (Propped Stimulated Reservoir Volume) Fracture Complexity A total of 12 water phase tracers and 12 oil phase tracers were injected sequentially from "Pad" to "Flush". After pumping the pad stage, unique tracers were used to tag the "Proppant Laden Fluid" from the 0.2 ppa 100 mesh sand stage to the 2 ppa 40/70 mesh sand stage, before going to flush. The flush volume was not traced. Upon flowback, produced fluids were analyzed for the concentration of each tracer within the produced fluid samples. The first goal was to determine whether any traced fluid would be placed within "unpropped" SRV. The second goal was to determine the order of load fluid returns, to verify the "first-in, last-out" phenomenon, and to ascertain any degree of fluid mixing, which could be an indication of increased fracture complexity. The results illustrate the average tracer concentration and arrival time of each traced fluid segment, which was then used to characterize the fracture stage. All tracers were detected in the produced fluid samples, indicating that no traced segment was placed outside of the propped fracture network. The results also indicate that significant tracer mixing occured within the fracture network, a potential indicator of fracture complexity. All individually traced segments flowed back simultaneously, albeit at varying tracer concentrations. The residence time calculation for each tracer showed that frac fluid injected into the later proppant segments generally flowed back faster than the earlier segments. No obvious piston-like displacement of frac fluid was observed from the tracer data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从化学示踪剂返排数据了解单个压裂段的压裂流体分布
该数据集包括将多种独特的化学示踪剂泵入单个“Wolfcamp B”压裂段。该示踪剂测试的目的是通过在典型的示踪剂返排报告中添加另一层粒度,揭示单独标记的流体和砂段的返排特性。通过观察单个流体段示踪剂的采收率,增加的级内细节可以深入了解页岩储层压裂时的裂缝行为。从“Pad”到“Flush”,共注入了12种水相示踪剂和12种油相示踪剂。泵送垫级后,在冲洗之前,使用独特的示踪剂将“支撑剂填充液”从0.2 ppa 100目砂级标记到2 ppa 40/70目砂级。未跟踪刷新卷。返排后,对采出液样品中每种示踪剂的浓度进行分析。第一个目标是确定是否将任何追踪流体放置在“未支撑”的SRV中。第二个目标是确定载荷流体回流的顺序,验证“先入后出”现象,并确定流体混合的程度,这可能是裂缝复杂性增加的标志。结果显示了每个追踪流体段的平均示踪剂浓度和到达时间,然后用于表征裂缝阶段。在产出的流体样品中检测到所有示踪剂,表明没有示踪段被放置在支撑裂缝网络之外。结果还表明,裂缝网络中出现了显著的示踪剂混合,这是裂缝复杂性的潜在指标。尽管示踪剂浓度不同,但所有单独追踪的片段同时回流。对每种示踪剂的停留时间计算表明,注入后段支撑剂的压裂液回流速度普遍快于前段支撑剂。从示踪剂数据中未观察到明显的活塞样压裂液位移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Permian Basin Production Performance Comparison Over Time and the Parent-Child Well Study Real Time Analysis of Formation Face Pressures in Acid Fracturing Treatments Wellbore Placement Optimization Using Particulate Oil-Soluble Tracers Investigation of Non-Ideal Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests Behavior in Unconventional Reservoirs Poroelastic Pressure Transient Analysis: A New Method for Interpretation of Pressure Communication Between Wells During Hydraulic Fracturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1