Uncertainty Reduction in Fatigue Life Validation Testing for Drilling Tools with a Universal Runout Compensator

M. Du, F. Song, Ke Li
{"title":"Uncertainty Reduction in Fatigue Life Validation Testing for Drilling Tools with a Universal Runout Compensator","authors":"M. Du, F. Song, Ke Li","doi":"10.1115/vvuq2023-107686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Rotating bending fatigue (RBF) life is a critical performance index for oil drilling equipment. It can be measured via cantilever-type RBF testing, with a sideload applied on the specimen to generate the required bending moment at the point of interest. Multiple factors cause runout or eccentricity of the test specimen at the sideload point, leading to deviations in the effective sideload acting on the specimen and, consequently, deviations in the bending moment at the point of interest. Runout generates greater uncertainty in fatigue life test results.\n A Universal Runout Compensator (URC) was developed to reduce this uncertainty by mitigating the test specimen runout. It consists of two eccentric bushings, one assembled inside the other. Depending on the relative orientation of the two bushings, the total eccentricity of the URC can be adjusted. With the properly set URC installed on the specimen, the final runout at the URC where the sideload is applied becomes negligible.\n Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to confirm the URC structural integrity. Full-scale RBF tests were conducted to validate the URC design and FEA studies. With the URC used in the tests, bending moment variation decreased by up to 15%, reducing life cycle uncertainty by up to 44%.","PeriodicalId":387733,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2023 Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2023 Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/vvuq2023-107686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rotating bending fatigue (RBF) life is a critical performance index for oil drilling equipment. It can be measured via cantilever-type RBF testing, with a sideload applied on the specimen to generate the required bending moment at the point of interest. Multiple factors cause runout or eccentricity of the test specimen at the sideload point, leading to deviations in the effective sideload acting on the specimen and, consequently, deviations in the bending moment at the point of interest. Runout generates greater uncertainty in fatigue life test results. A Universal Runout Compensator (URC) was developed to reduce this uncertainty by mitigating the test specimen runout. It consists of two eccentric bushings, one assembled inside the other. Depending on the relative orientation of the two bushings, the total eccentricity of the URC can be adjusted. With the properly set URC installed on the specimen, the final runout at the URC where the sideload is applied becomes negligible. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to confirm the URC structural integrity. Full-scale RBF tests were conducted to validate the URC design and FEA studies. With the URC used in the tests, bending moment variation decreased by up to 15%, reducing life cycle uncertainty by up to 44%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用通用跳动补偿器的钻具疲劳寿命验证试验的不确定性降低
旋转弯曲疲劳(RBF)寿命是石油钻井设备的一项重要性能指标。它可以通过悬臂式RBF测试来测量,在试样上施加侧载荷以在感兴趣点产生所需的弯矩。多种因素导致试样在侧载点的跳动或偏心,导致作用在试样上的有效侧载的偏差,从而导致感兴趣点弯矩的偏差。跳动在疲劳寿命试验结果中产生较大的不确定性。通用跳动补偿器(URC)的开发,以减少这种不确定性,减轻试样跳动。它由两个偏心轴套组成,一个安装在另一个内部。根据两个轴套的相对方向,URC的总偏心可以调整。在试样上安装适当设置的URC后,在施加侧向载荷的URC处的最终跳动变得可以忽略不计。采用有限元分析(FEA)验证了URC结构的完整性。进行了全尺寸RBF试验,以验证URC设计和FEA研究。在测试中使用URC后,弯矩变化减少了15%,将生命周期的不确定性减少了44%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variational Bayesian Calibration of a PTW Material Strength Model for OFHC Copper Using Code Adequacy Methodologies in Confomance with ASME Standards for Nuclear Power Plant Analysis Evaluation Models Attaining the Asymptotic Range in Rans Simulations Digital Image Correlation Validation of Finite Element Strain Analysis of Dental Implant Insertion for Two Implant Designs Probabilistic Deep Learning for Validation of Emergent Structures in Simulated Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1