Reading Richard Powers' The Overstory: ‘treeing’ the issue of interdisciplinary knowledge

Lisanne E. Meinen, Kaixuan Yao, K. Herforth
{"title":"Reading Richard Powers' The Overstory: ‘treeing’ the issue of interdisciplinary knowledge","authors":"Lisanne E. Meinen, Kaixuan Yao, K. Herforth","doi":"10.33391/jgjh.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that Richard Powers’ The Overstory is an example of how literature, as a narrative that is both reflective and focused on representation, contributes to current circulating debates surrounding the valorisation, productivity and practicality of interdisciplinary knowledge. This essay reads Powers’ novel against the tendency within our society to value literature only on the basis of individual artistic accomplishments. This tendency establishes a boundary between art and science and excludes literature from the realm of a ‘problem-solving’ practicality (Clark 190). As our analysis shows, the novel reflects on the impact and value of interdisciplinary knowledge by presenting a narrative that traces the production and reception of a interdisciplinary work. Additionally, the novel endows the debate about interdisciplinary knowledge with a new light by ‘treeing’ its narrative in both its narratological form and thematic content. It listens to the message of trees as lives mediating between multiple spatial-temporal scales and frames the characters’ sensitivity to this message as a scale awareness. Finally, the interdisciplinary conflicts are read as scale conflicts which the characters in the novel encounter when they try to provide solution to the issue of deforestation.","PeriodicalId":115950,"journal":{"name":"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33391/jgjh.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This essay argues that Richard Powers’ The Overstory is an example of how literature, as a narrative that is both reflective and focused on representation, contributes to current circulating debates surrounding the valorisation, productivity and practicality of interdisciplinary knowledge. This essay reads Powers’ novel against the tendency within our society to value literature only on the basis of individual artistic accomplishments. This tendency establishes a boundary between art and science and excludes literature from the realm of a ‘problem-solving’ practicality (Clark 190). As our analysis shows, the novel reflects on the impact and value of interdisciplinary knowledge by presenting a narrative that traces the production and reception of a interdisciplinary work. Additionally, the novel endows the debate about interdisciplinary knowledge with a new light by ‘treeing’ its narrative in both its narratological form and thematic content. It listens to the message of trees as lives mediating between multiple spatial-temporal scales and frames the characters’ sensitivity to this message as a scale awareness. Finally, the interdisciplinary conflicts are read as scale conflicts which the characters in the novel encounter when they try to provide solution to the issue of deforestation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读理查德·鲍尔斯的《上层故事》:“树形”跨学科知识的问题
本文认为,理查德·鲍尔斯(Richard Powers)的《上层故事》(The Overstory)是一个例子,说明文学作为一种既反思又关注再现的叙事,如何有助于当前围绕跨学科知识的增值、生产力和实用性的流行辩论。这篇文章读了鲍尔斯的小说,反对我们社会中只根据个人艺术成就来评价文学的倾向。这种倾向在艺术和科学之间建立了界限,并将文学排除在“解决问题”的实用性领域之外(Clark 190)。正如我们的分析所显示的那样,小说通过呈现一种追溯跨学科作品的生产和接受的叙事,反映了跨学科知识的影响和价值。此外,小说通过在叙事形式和主题内容上“树形化”叙事,为跨学科知识的争论提供了新的视角。它倾听树木作为生命在多个时空尺度之间传递的信息,并将角色对这一信息的敏感性构建为一种尺度意识。最后,跨学科冲突被解读为小说中人物在试图解决森林砍伐问题时遇到的规模冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Recreating Katalin Street': Reenacting a Haunting Past Utopia as Manifestation and Bodily Testimony to Trauma in Magda Szabó's Katalin Street Introduction to the Special Section on the 2022 Utrecht Philosophy Graduate Conference Rethinking Political Organization from a Feminist Standpoint: Politicizing an Ethics of Care and Vulnerability Why Make Atlas Dance? Colonial Utopia that Persists in Contemporary Robotics Monstrous Mushrooms, Toxic Love and Queer Utopias in Jenny Hval's Paradise Rot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1