Rethinking Political Organization from a Feminist Standpoint: Politicizing an Ethics of Care and Vulnerability

Roxane Eva Sarah Pret Théodore
{"title":"Rethinking Political Organization from a Feminist Standpoint: Politicizing an Ethics of Care and Vulnerability","authors":"Roxane Eva Sarah Pret Théodore","doi":"10.33391/jgjh.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I develop a philosophical account demonstrating how alternative feminist concepts, in particular an ethics of care and vulnerability, would help improve our political policies and practices. I suggest that reviewing our political institutions from a feminist standpoint allows for a rethinking of these structures and practices in a more democratic framework, opening the field to all minoritized groups that are excluded from it still. I rely on a positive account of vulnerability, understood as an inherent relational dynamic of interdependency and solidarity between embodied subjects, rather than an individual show of weakness in reaction to violence. The central question I address is: if caring relations of solidarity are a possible response to vulnerability, how can this inform politics despite the ambiguity of vulnerability itself? Is such a positive reframing of the concept even possible? In other words, how do we articulate vulnerability with violence, and can it be reframed outside of these ties to violence? First, I look at Judith Butler’s positive renewal of the concept (Butler 2004). Second, I contrast this approach to the complementary findings of Adriana Cavarero (Cavarero 2011) that would allow for the emancipation of vulnerability from its dichotomous ties to violence. These findings could have political ramifications for addressing a revisited account of vulnerability that informs alternative political institutions and practices, which I explore in the final section.","PeriodicalId":115950,"journal":{"name":"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities","volume":"11 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33391/jgjh.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I develop a philosophical account demonstrating how alternative feminist concepts, in particular an ethics of care and vulnerability, would help improve our political policies and practices. I suggest that reviewing our political institutions from a feminist standpoint allows for a rethinking of these structures and practices in a more democratic framework, opening the field to all minoritized groups that are excluded from it still. I rely on a positive account of vulnerability, understood as an inherent relational dynamic of interdependency and solidarity between embodied subjects, rather than an individual show of weakness in reaction to violence. The central question I address is: if caring relations of solidarity are a possible response to vulnerability, how can this inform politics despite the ambiguity of vulnerability itself? Is such a positive reframing of the concept even possible? In other words, how do we articulate vulnerability with violence, and can it be reframed outside of these ties to violence? First, I look at Judith Butler’s positive renewal of the concept (Butler 2004). Second, I contrast this approach to the complementary findings of Adriana Cavarero (Cavarero 2011) that would allow for the emancipation of vulnerability from its dichotomous ties to violence. These findings could have political ramifications for addressing a revisited account of vulnerability that informs alternative political institutions and practices, which I explore in the final section.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从女性主义立场反思政治组织:关怀与脆弱性伦理的政治化
在本文中,我从哲学角度阐述了替代性女权主义概念,尤其是关爱和脆弱性伦理,将如何帮助改善我们的政治政策和实践。我认为,从女权主义的角度来审视我们的政治体制,可以在一个更加民主的框架内重新思考这些结构和实践,向所有仍被排除在外的少数群体开放这个领域。我对脆弱性进行了积极的阐述,将其理解为体现主体之间相互依存、团结一致的内在关系动力,而非个人对暴力的示弱反应。我所探讨的核心问题是:如果团结互助的关爱关系是对脆弱性的一种可能回应,那么,尽管脆弱性本身具有模糊性,这又如何为政治提供依据?是否有可能对这一概念进行积极的重构?换句话说,我们如何将脆弱性与暴力联系起来?首先,我将探讨朱迪斯-巴特勒(Judith Butler)对这一概念的积极革新(巴特勒,2004 年)。其次,我将这一方法与阿德里安娜-卡瓦列罗(Adriana Cavarero,2011 年)的补充性发现进行对比,后者允许将脆弱性从其与暴力的二分法联系中解放出来。这些发现可能会产生政治影响,有助于重新审视脆弱性,为替代性政治体制和实践提供依据,我将在最后一节对此进行探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Recreating Katalin Street': Reenacting a Haunting Past Utopia as Manifestation and Bodily Testimony to Trauma in Magda Szabó's Katalin Street Introduction to the Special Section on the 2022 Utrecht Philosophy Graduate Conference Rethinking Political Organization from a Feminist Standpoint: Politicizing an Ethics of Care and Vulnerability Why Make Atlas Dance? Colonial Utopia that Persists in Contemporary Robotics Monstrous Mushrooms, Toxic Love and Queer Utopias in Jenny Hval's Paradise Rot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1