Misconceptions about Computer Science Leads to Deferred Entrance to the Technology Field

Tabitha Miles
{"title":"Misconceptions about Computer Science Leads to Deferred Entrance to the Technology Field","authors":"Tabitha Miles","doi":"10.1145/3478432.3499209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A qualitative study of 34 young technology professionals (average age 29.6 yo) indicates that most had misunderstandings about the Computer Science field before they began their Computer Science education. During interviews with both traditional Computer Science graduates (N=16) and bootcamp graduates (N=18), the most common misconception reported was an overstatement of the role of mathematics in the field (31/34). In addition, about a third (11/34; 8 female, one male) anticipated barriers (\"inaccessible\", \"male-dominated\") and most (31/34) believed coding was difficult or held other negative associations. Finally, many reported not having an understanding of Computer Science at all (18/34:7 college; 11 bootcamp) College graduates reported having other experiences (coding, mentors) that offset this general lack of understanding and negative connotations. These findings suggest that these misunderstandings are a barrier for many when considering a college major. Debunking these myths earlier may decrease perceived barriers for those without counter-balancing experiences.","PeriodicalId":113773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3478432.3499209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A qualitative study of 34 young technology professionals (average age 29.6 yo) indicates that most had misunderstandings about the Computer Science field before they began their Computer Science education. During interviews with both traditional Computer Science graduates (N=16) and bootcamp graduates (N=18), the most common misconception reported was an overstatement of the role of mathematics in the field (31/34). In addition, about a third (11/34; 8 female, one male) anticipated barriers ("inaccessible", "male-dominated") and most (31/34) believed coding was difficult or held other negative associations. Finally, many reported not having an understanding of Computer Science at all (18/34:7 college; 11 bootcamp) College graduates reported having other experiences (coding, mentors) that offset this general lack of understanding and negative connotations. These findings suggest that these misunderstandings are a barrier for many when considering a college major. Debunking these myths earlier may decrease perceived barriers for those without counter-balancing experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对计算机科学的误解导致推迟进入技术领域
一项针对34名年轻技术专业人员(平均年龄29.6岁)的定性研究表明,大多数人在开始接受计算机科学教育之前对计算机科学领域存在误解。在对传统计算机科学毕业生(N=16)和训练营毕业生(N=18)的采访中,最常见的误解是夸大了数学在该领域的作用(31/34)。此外,约三分之一(11/34;8名女性,1名男性)预期障碍(“难以接近”,“男性主导”),大多数(31/34)认为编码困难或持有其他负面联想。最后,许多人表示根本不了解计算机科学(18/34:7 college;大学毕业生报告说,他们有其他经历(编程、导师)来抵消这种普遍缺乏理解和负面含义。这些发现表明,这些误解是许多人在考虑大学专业时遇到的障碍。尽早揭穿这些神话可能会减少那些没有平衡经验的人所感受到的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community Input and Engagement for CS202x: Data Management The Development of Computational Thinking in Computing Higher Education Understanding and Tracking Computing Instructor Identity The Effect of Animations Using Real-world Analogies on Diverse Computer Systems Students SIGCSE Reads 2022: Using Challenging Stories in your Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1