Providing Financial Services 'Efficiently, Honestly and Fairly'

P. Latimer
{"title":"Providing Financial Services 'Efficiently, Honestly and Fairly'","authors":"P. Latimer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1326181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australia's national securities commission - the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) - sees the stockbroker's or investment adviser's obligation to act efficiently, honestly and fairly in s 912A(1)(a) of Australia's Corporations Act as both a stand-alone obligation that a broker or adviser (an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensee) must satisfy, and an obligation that encompasses other obligations under their AFS license. A licensee may be in breach of its statutory obligation to provide services efficiently, honestly and fairly even if it is complying with all of its other specified obligations. This general obligation includes personal competencies, and imposes continuing obligations on the licensee and its representatives when providing financial services from the beginning of the relationship to its end. Included in the licensee's obligations are its duties as an employer to its employees, even if intermingled with other obligations regarding financial services. The obligation of acting efficiently, honestly and fairly parallels legal action under other sections in the Corporations Act. The importance of the test is that it triggers ASIC's administrative procedure of suspending, canceling or banning an offender for breach of the obligation to act efficiently, honesty and fairly. This can present potential problems because it allows ASIC to bypass specific provisions in the Corporations Act, avoid the decision whether to pursue civil or criminal proceedings, avoid briefing prosecutors and allows it to deal with the matter by means of the administrative process of suspending, canceling or banning a licensee for breach of the obligation to act efficiently, honestly and fairly. Even criminal activity such as false transfers, false entries, illegal trading and manipulation - which ASIC may classify as gross misconduct - can be dealt with administratively for failure to provide financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly. The test of whether financial services are provided efficiently, honestly and fairly is written in plain English. It is not encumbered with existing interpretations and its scope is not fixed, so it cannot become obsolete, and like the evolution of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52, the expected standard of the financial services licensee of efficiency, honesty and fairness will continue to evolve to meet new situations in the marketplace for financial services.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1326181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Australia's national securities commission - the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) - sees the stockbroker's or investment adviser's obligation to act efficiently, honestly and fairly in s 912A(1)(a) of Australia's Corporations Act as both a stand-alone obligation that a broker or adviser (an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensee) must satisfy, and an obligation that encompasses other obligations under their AFS license. A licensee may be in breach of its statutory obligation to provide services efficiently, honestly and fairly even if it is complying with all of its other specified obligations. This general obligation includes personal competencies, and imposes continuing obligations on the licensee and its representatives when providing financial services from the beginning of the relationship to its end. Included in the licensee's obligations are its duties as an employer to its employees, even if intermingled with other obligations regarding financial services. The obligation of acting efficiently, honestly and fairly parallels legal action under other sections in the Corporations Act. The importance of the test is that it triggers ASIC's administrative procedure of suspending, canceling or banning an offender for breach of the obligation to act efficiently, honesty and fairly. This can present potential problems because it allows ASIC to bypass specific provisions in the Corporations Act, avoid the decision whether to pursue civil or criminal proceedings, avoid briefing prosecutors and allows it to deal with the matter by means of the administrative process of suspending, canceling or banning a licensee for breach of the obligation to act efficiently, honestly and fairly. Even criminal activity such as false transfers, false entries, illegal trading and manipulation - which ASIC may classify as gross misconduct - can be dealt with administratively for failure to provide financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly. The test of whether financial services are provided efficiently, honestly and fairly is written in plain English. It is not encumbered with existing interpretations and its scope is not fixed, so it cannot become obsolete, and like the evolution of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52, the expected standard of the financial services licensee of efficiency, honesty and fairness will continue to evolve to meet new situations in the marketplace for financial services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“高效、诚实、公平”地提供金融服务
澳大利亚国家证券委员会-澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC) -认为股票经纪人或投资顾问在澳大利亚公司法第912A(1)(a)条中高效,诚实和公平行事的义务既是经纪人或顾问(澳大利亚金融服务(AFS)持牌人)必须履行的独立义务,也是包含其AFS许可证下其他义务的义务。持牌人即使遵守了所有其他指明的义务,也可能违反了有效、诚实和公平地提供服务的法定义务。这一一般义务包括个人能力,并对持牌人及其代表施加了从关系开始至结束期间提供金融服务的持续义务。被许可人的义务包括其作为雇主对其雇员的义务,即使与有关金融服务的其他义务混合在一起。有效、诚实和公平行事的义务与《公司法》其他章节规定的法律行动相同。该测试的重要性在于,它触发了ASIC的行政程序,暂停、取消或禁止违反有效、诚实和公平行事义务的违法者。这可能会带来潜在的问题,因为它允许ASIC绕过公司法的具体规定,避免决定是否进行民事或刑事诉讼,避免向检察官通报情况,并允许它通过暂停、取消或禁止违反有效、诚实和公平行动义务的被许可人的行政程序来处理此事。即使是虚假转账、虚假录入、非法交易和操纵等犯罪活动(ASIC可能将其归类为严重不当行为),也可以因未能有效、诚实和公平地提供金融服务而受到行政处理。检验金融服务提供是否有效、诚实和公平的标准是用通俗易懂的英语写的。它不受现有解释的阻碍,其范围也不是固定的,因此它不会过时,就像1974年《贸易惯例法》(Cth)第52条的演变一样,金融服务持牌人对效率、诚实和公平的预期标准将继续发展,以适应金融服务市场的新情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antitrust Error Costs Bostock was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, and Title VII 5G Deployment: The Role and Challenges of Regulatory Bodies in Ensuring Convergence Within the EU Data Point: 2019 Mortgage Market Activity and Trends The CIA's Democratic Integrity: Information Sharing and Electoral Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1